Posted on 09/18/2005 7:49:10 PM PDT by akdonn
KETCHIKAN -- Mike Salazar, the Ketchikan borough mayor, had just fielded a call from Reader's Digest. Another reporter wanting to talk about "the Bridge to Nowhere."
The proposed $315 million bridge from this small Alaska city to a neighboring, nearly uninhabited island, has become a sensation. It's made Ketchikan famous, but not in a way Salazar likes.
"It makes me frustrated that we haven't been able to communicate our need well enough for the rest of the United States to understand it," said the mayor, who was first elected to the town council in 1976.
Salazar said, "Everybody calls it a bridge to nowhere. ... It's a bridge to our future."
(Excerpt) Read more at adn.com ...
The ferry ride costs $5 each way for a passenger and another $6 to bring a car.
A bridge costing about $24,000 per resident? While it is not quite the boondoggle it is billed to be, neither do I see a major inconvenience in taking the ferry to an airport. Even the $1,000,000 estimated annual maintainence cost of the bridge would pay for 125 trips per year for every resident of Ketchikan.
I know! We could call it The Bridge To The 21st Century. Unless that name's already taken, I haven't Googled it.
Actually, I've ridden this ferry many times. It can be kind of hairy when the wind is whipping through and the rain is sideways, but I think there is a need to develop the land around the airport because Ketchikan is boxed in by mountains. It's like alot of things in Alaska; we have to do what we can when we have the opportunity, because there may not be another chance for a long time.
Wow. I've done some things like that myself; that is probably why Alaska has such a high death rate from boating accidents! Some of us luck out, and I think I'm a better boater because of such experiences over the years. (My 75 year old father and I just went fishing in Prince William Sound yesterday and got hit with some pretty stiff winds--but I have a great boat).
On Prince William Sound I was fishing with a friend on his boat and we got hit by a barge, nearly sunk us (he HAD a nice boat)
And you think driving across a narrow bridge in those conditions would be relaxing?
I've gone across the Akashi Kaikyo Ohashi, largest suspension bridge in the world, linking Honshu with Awaji Island, millions on the Honshu side, thousands on the Awaji side. During typhoon-force winds and sideways rains, the bridge gets closed even though the water below has got to be at least 20 degrees warmer than the ocean current flowing through Ketchikan.
Whoa, I think I know why you're in TEXAS!
Relaxing???? Maybe in a Corvette. We live with the weather all of the time.
I'm not convinced Ketchikan needs the bridge, mind you.
Tell me something about the people on that island:
Did somebody hold a gun to their heads and make them live there? I mean, it being so inconvenient and all?
And if they need the bridge so bad, how about they pay for it themselves?
They can't you say? Costs too much money?
How about when I need a new well drilled, I ask someone in Alaska to poney up the 15 grand? Who do I contact about that?
Don't matter that Russia sold the US a Brooklyn Bridge way back when.
I ride this ferry back and forth to the airport every 3 weeks and have done so for 10 years. I've been on it in every kind of weather, and though the weather may be hairy, the ride NEVER is. This bridge is TOTALLY un-neccessary. I really hope the money goes to something else....it is not needed here.
You don't want to know anything about the people on that island, so why don't you just make your point instead of trying to sound like dick tracy?
Lots of people live on islands all over Alaska, and they choose to do that. It's a good kind of life, actually, but not too many of them live on Gravina Island near Ketchikan. That is the island where the airport is located. As a matter of fact, Gov. Murkowski's wife also owns a parcel of land there. I don't think that has anything to do with the bill to build a bridge there, however.
IF you bothered to read the entire story I posted, you would see that everybody in Ketchikan doesn't think they need a bridge. Also, if you bothered to read my previous posts you might also know that I am not advocating for the bridge but simply posted it as a matter of interest.
And, because it rains all the time in Ketchikan YOU could move there and you wouldn't need a well...
Everyone compalined about the original "bridge to nowhere" in 1956. The 26 mile bridge across Lake Ponchartrain. 13 years later a second bridge was built because of all the development it created.
I'll be watching this story with interest. My friends just moved to Ketchikan. She is going to be a doctor up there. He sent me photos of the water view they have from their new house. Very nice!!
I am not sure what my friend's opinion of this bridge might be, but from my view here in the SF Bay area, I say let them have their bridge. After seeing how the government dorks around with boondoggles down here, I think this bridge in Ketchikan should be the least of our worries. How come the boondoggles down in the liberal areas never get held up for ridicule as a "something" to "nowhere"?? I can think of all sorts of things in California that can (and should) be mocked, as opposed to this bridge. In my opinion, they deserve it a lot more than the stupid liberals here in California deserve anything!! California is too busy giving free public education and medical treatment to illegal aliens from Mexico, thank YOU Feinstein and Boxer.
Of course, Ketchikan is still cut off from the rest of the world. Even with this bridge, the only ways to reach it are by boat or by air. My friend in Ketchikan tells me that there is an even longer term plan to eventually build a road from Ketchikan to Canada, so that they can be connected to the North American highway system. However, that would take even MORE bridges, and probably BILLIONS of dollars. Hence, it will be interesting to see how the mainstream news media reacts to THAT one when the time comes!! Maybe there will be a blizzard in Miami (due to global warming) which we will need to spend THOSE dollars upon instead!!
Not sure. The seaplane # is just an average of the privately owned planes taking off per day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.