PETA is an interesting case. I think it would be really kool of PETA if they suggested a temporary cut in EPA spending to help get funds for NOLA, to admit that people are important too.
And it would also raise PETA's worldwide respect to demand that floodgates be installed there next time around, despite the environmentalist lawsuit, not only for the sake of human life but for the sake of animal life, which is endangered by floods just as much as people are, if not more so.
>>>And it would also raise PETA's worldwide respect to demand that floodgates be installed there next time around, despite the environmentalist lawsuit, not only for the sake of human life but for the sake of animal life, which is endangered by floods just as much as people are, if not more so.
Worldwide respect? Let's not get too excited :))
But they should use their 'save the animal' money to GO SAVE THE ANIMALS from Katrina.
Pose it to justify their existence.
Otherwise LINE ITEM CUT :))
More money to allocate to NOLA.