"New York Republicans" are not "Real Republicans" and I offer as evidence the present and former mayors of New York City.
As a former nyc resident Bloomberg is pro abortion pro gay marriage anti gun and raised property taxes 37% anybody he doesnt like is good enough for me
Screw Bloomberg. He's not even a RINO, he's a RAT with an R after his name.
So, how many confirmation votes does Michael Bloomberg get?
Bloomberg doesn't have a say in the matter!
Posturing fool!
This is no different than when Guiliani endorsed BILL CLINTON IN 1996.
Bloomberg is a democrat who became a republican to satisfy his personal ego.
Truth be known Bloomberg is a RINO, his heart is with liberal democRATS. He gets his support from throwing millions around. More reason to support Judge Roberts.
I can't believe he's going to vote against his own president on the confirmation!
I don't give a damn what he thinks.
The Constitution doesn't either.
Why does a zip in Italia care about our Supreme Court Justices?
Bloomy is a democrat, plain and simple. He likes the company of Republicans more than democrats, which is why he chose out party. Poort thing has no choice but to make statements like these if he has any hope of winning in NYC. It is ashame that NYC along with much of the left coast is so heavily populated with morons.
So become a judge, yourself, Mayor Bloomberg.
Bloomberg is saying, "Oh, Woe,
Judge Roberts might overturn Roe."
The Boston-born mayor,
Is a pushy nay-sayer,
My opinion of him's at a low.
And his opinion on this matters because? Are Supreme Court picks an issue in a mayor's race?
http://1010wins.com/topstories/local_story_260174058.html
Sep 17, 2005 5:38 pm US/Eastern
(1010 WINS) (NEW YORK) Campaigning for re-election in an unquestionably liberal city, Mayor Michael Bloomberg has broken with fellow Republicans, saying he opposes President Bush's pick for Chief Justice of the United States.
Bloomberg said he couldn't support nominee John G. Roberts because the judge had failed to clearly indicate during his Senate confirmation hearings whether he accepts the Roe v. Wade abortion ruling as "settled law."
"What I was waiting for, as were many Americans, was a clear affirmation that the life-altering decision as to whether or not to have a child must be a woman's decision," Bloomberg said in a statement distributed to reporters on Friday.
"Unfortunately, Judge Roberts' response did not indicate a commitment to protect a woman's right to choose."
Roberts sidestepped questions about both his personal and legal views on abortion during three days of testimony this week before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
When questioned about Roe v. Wade, Roberts said the 1973 ruling legalizing abortion was "entitled to respect" as a court precedent, but declined to say how he might vote if given the opportunity to reverse the landmark decision.
Many Republicans have defended Roberts' refusal to directly answer questions about important legal issues, saying it would be inappropriate for him to talk about some issues that might later come before him as a judge.
Bloomberg said he had hoped to hear Roberts make at least a "simple affirmation of Roe v. Wade, a decision which has had a long-lasting, profound impact in improving women's health and lives."
"There can be no turning back and for that reason I oppose the nomination of Judge Roberts as chief justice."
The mayor's announcement is unlikely to influence Roberts' nomination, which has yet to be substantially challenged in the Senate.
It may, however, aid Bloomberg's re-election campaign.
Democrats vastly outnumber Republicans in New York, and Bloomberg — who left the Democratic Party four years ago to run for mayor — will need large numbers of them to cross party lines if he is to win a second term this November.
His likely opponent is Fernando Ferrer, a former Bronx borough president who claimed about 40 percent of the vote in Tuesday's Democratic primary.
ping