Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rob777
he pointed to an expanded future role for the feds in this area

There will need to be a public "debate" on whether the Fed. gov't (military) can step in without express permission of the state.

The debate will be a good one -- in which Blanco's failures will become apparent, even if no one names names.

44 posted on 09/16/2005 10:04:14 AM PDT by syriacus (To stay in power, Democrats need a MSM willing to lie about people + events + the constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: syriacus
There will need to be a public "debate" on whether the Fed. gov't (military) can step in without express permission of the state.

We can guess the conservative position on the issue of Feds taking over state functions. They'd rather see the Feds refrain.

It will be most interesting to see what the libs say. I hope someone asks Hillary point-blank.

My brother (a "super-duper" liberal) was criticising the Feds for not stepping in, right away, to take the "disaster response" reins out of Blanco's hands.

I'm anxious to see how much he really likes the idea of Fed intervention, now that the Libs have opened this Pandora's box.

47 posted on 09/16/2005 10:17:20 AM PDT by syriacus (To stay in power, Democrats need a MSM willing to lie about people + events + the constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson