Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/15/2005 9:49:14 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Coleus

As a Catholic, but more importantly, as an American, I found it deeply offensive that members of the United States Senate would try to enact a religious test for public office. Who do they think that they are? Englishman?


2 posted on 09/15/2005 9:51:54 PM PDT by Sthitch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
"In 1960, there was much debate about President John F. Kennedy's faith and what role Catholicism would play in his administration. At that time, he pledged to address the issues of conscience out of a focus on the national interests, not out of adherence to the dictates of one's religion. . . . My question is: Do you?"

Article VI, Clause 3:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

'Nuff said.

3 posted on 09/15/2005 9:54:39 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus

What were the answers?


4 posted on 09/15/2005 9:56:34 PM PDT by angelanddevil2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
While others here are complaining about Senator Lott and wishing him to retire, I think the worst republican of all is Arlen Spector. How dare he do this!
5 posted on 09/15/2005 9:57:55 PM PDT by ladyinred (It is all my fault okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus

Our Government officials unconstitutional? Nah, I don't belive it.


7 posted on 09/15/2005 10:01:11 PM PDT by Archon of the East ("universal executive power of the law of nature")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus

I wonder how Sens. Spector and Feinstein would react to being questioned whether they would put the interests of the United States over those of Israel. I can imagine their howels about anti-semitism.


8 posted on 09/15/2005 10:03:31 PM PDT by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus

Arlen Sphincter is an embarrassment to the Republican Party. :/


11 posted on 09/15/2005 10:10:32 PM PDT by publana (yes, I checked the preview box without previewing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
"In 1960, there was much debate about President John F. Kennedy's faith and what role Catholicism would play in his administration. At that time, he pledged to address the issues of conscience out of a focus on the national interests, not out of adherence to the dictates of one's religion. . . . My question is: Do you?"

This would be my response:

Yes I do, Senator Feinstein. I promise not to let JFK's religious faith influence my interpretation of the Constitution.

18 posted on 09/15/2005 10:41:28 PM PDT by Jess Kitting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus; american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; ...
Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


23 posted on 09/16/2005 1:11:48 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
If he were a Supreme Court nominee, I guess the views of Michael Newdow (Pledge of Allegiance creep) wouldn't be questioned at all by the Senate committee's 'Rat inquisitors.

Atheists would get a pass.

Leni

25 posted on 09/16/2005 4:06:11 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson