1 posted on
09/15/2005 9:49:14 PM PDT by
Coleus
To: Coleus
As a Catholic, but more importantly, as an American, I found it deeply offensive that members of the United States Senate would try to enact a religious test for public office. Who do they think that they are? Englishman?
2 posted on
09/15/2005 9:51:54 PM PDT by
Sthitch
To: Coleus
"In 1960, there was much debate about President John F. Kennedy's faith and what role Catholicism would play in his administration. At that time, he pledged to address the issues of conscience out of a focus on the national interests, not out of adherence to the dictates of one's religion. . . . My question is: Do you?"
Article VI, Clause 3:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
'Nuff said.
To: Coleus
To: Coleus
While others here are complaining about Senator Lott and wishing him to retire, I think the worst republican of all is Arlen Spector. How dare he do this!
5 posted on
09/15/2005 9:57:55 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(It is all my fault okay?)
To: Coleus
Our Government officials unconstitutional? Nah, I don't belive it.
7 posted on
09/15/2005 10:01:11 PM PDT by
Archon of the East
("universal executive power of the law of nature")
To: Coleus
I wonder how Sens. Spector and Feinstein would react to being questioned whether they would put the interests of the United States over those of Israel. I can imagine their howels about anti-semitism.
8 posted on
09/15/2005 10:03:31 PM PDT by
Hugin
To: Coleus
Arlen Sphincter is an embarrassment to the Republican Party. :/
11 posted on
09/15/2005 10:10:32 PM PDT by
publana
(yes, I checked the preview box without previewing)
To: Coleus
"In 1960, there was much debate about President John F. Kennedy's faith and what role Catholicism would play in his administration. At that time, he pledged to address the issues of conscience out of a focus on the national interests, not out of adherence to the dictates of one's religion. . . . My question is: Do you?" This would be my response:
Yes I do, Senator Feinstein. I promise not to let JFK's religious faith influence my interpretation of the Constitution.
To: Coleus; american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; ...
Catholic Ping Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
![](http://www.vatican.va/gpII/immagini/index_pent_en_40.jpg)
23 posted on
09/16/2005 1:11:48 AM PDT by
NYer
To: Coleus
If he were a Supreme Court nominee, I guess the views of Michael Newdow (Pledge of Allegiance creep) wouldn't be questioned at all by the Senate committee's 'Rat inquisitors.
Atheists would get a pass.
Leni
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson