Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Law Would Require Cleaning Ice, Snow From Cars
The Associated Press ^ | September 15, 2005 | AP

Posted on 09/15/2005 8:35:32 PM PDT by Westlander

BOSTON -- It's cold, it's snowing, and there's ice and snow on the car. So you hop in and go without clearing off all the winter precipitation.

That might soon be against the law in Massachusetts.

The state Legislature is considering a bill that would mean fines of up to $500 and a six-month stay in jail.

The bill is designed to reduce the danger from chunks of snow and ice flying off car roofs or hoods.

If it passes, Massachusetts could become the first state to require snow- and ice-free cars.


TOPICS: Government; Political Humor/Cartoons; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: ice; liberals; massachusetts; nannystate; snow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-217 next last
To: Westlander
The actions of people who have chauffeurs to clean their cars for them...
61 posted on 09/15/2005 9:48:14 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Beware of Geeks bearing GIFs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I don't have a problem with a law like this. Anyone who has driven along a highway and sustained windshield or body damage from a chunk of ice flying off the roof of some jack@ss who didn't bother clearing off his vehicle understands what I'm talking about.

Just steer clear of Volvo drivers.

62 posted on 09/15/2005 9:53:59 PM PDT by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Species8472

Thanks for the comments to all Freepers who live in 'cold' states. You do understand. Next law Mass. will pass will be ice/snow removal from house roofs so the paperboy doesn't get impaled by a 3ft. icicle. (I do use a roof rake) You cannot legislate against stupidity. That is the point.


63 posted on 09/15/2005 10:00:32 PM PDT by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

I needed a laugh today and your tagline provided it-thanks!


64 posted on 09/15/2005 10:01:50 PM PDT by midnightson (Mama-the ultimate prognosticator- said there'd be days like this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Westlander
Rule of thumb. "Drive the conditions. Timing, distance, speed, acceleration, decelleration are the formulae."

When I see some jerk who is too lazy to have cleared his roof of ice and snow, I back off. OTOH, I do not tailgate.

Why do we need more flippin laws to govern basic common sense? Hey folks, 200 years ago did we need all this sh!'ite?

The way this country is directed, we will need a pass, and pay a fee to drink from a public H2O fountain.

65 posted on 09/15/2005 10:03:11 PM PDT by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NY Attitude

66 posted on 09/15/2005 10:07:53 PM PDT by squirt-gun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: midnightson
I needed a laugh today and your tagline provided it-thanks!

Glad to be of service...just changed it...before this one, it was, "Looters=undocumented consumers|Looting=purchases with indefinite deferred payment plans".

67 posted on 09/15/2005 10:09:01 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Yeah, we could also allow drunks on the road (we can avoid them too, right?) and pickup trucks with unsecured furniture and other debris to roam the roadways.

How about dump trucks with uncovered gravel going 120 mph (can they go that fast?)..........

Why have speed limits while we are at it - heck we can just dodge the fast ones, right?

Can we throw trash out the windows while driving? Hmmm.... :)
68 posted on 09/15/2005 10:10:25 PM PDT by Time4Atlas2Shrug (Use those bootstraps, cowboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I don't have a problem with a law like this. Anyone who has driven along a highway and sustained windshield or body damage from a chunk of ice flying off the roof of some jack@ss who didn't bother clearing off his vehicle understands what I'm talking about

Agreed. And if it causes an accident and/or injury, they should be held responsible.

69 posted on 09/15/2005 10:13:53 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mears
I also saw a woman driving when the entire sheet of ice from her roof slid forward and she could see NOTHING.

Was she driving backwards?!

70 posted on 09/15/2005 10:15:52 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

pinging


71 posted on 09/15/2005 10:17:48 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay

>>>When will they pass the, "Butt wiping is mandatory" law?

You make jokes; yet you may not be aware that they came out with the 'clean hands' initiative....to collect pork for programs to write checks to create positions that will create retirement funds....yada yada yada

In todays climate of Anti discrimination, do you think they will stop at hands and exclude the other body parts?

Look in the mirror, see dollar signs for fat politicians.


72 posted on 09/15/2005 10:19:27 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

73 posted on 09/15/2005 10:20:15 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking

Just Damn ping!


74 posted on 09/15/2005 10:20:47 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: #1CTYankee; .303 Brit; 2nd amendment mama; Agamemnon; AGBRUHN; always vigilant; Anarchist; ...
probably coming next to Connecticut ping!

Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.

75 posted on 09/15/2005 10:21:57 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow

ping!


76 posted on 09/15/2005 10:23:30 PM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westlander

About time someone made a law for this ( or at least is trying ).

I am so tired of dodging chunks of ice/snow flying from vehicles when I ride my motorcycle in the winter. : )

I wonder if the semi trucks are included in this? They throw off some pretty big pieces !

I bet there will be alot more people late for work on snowy days once this goes into effect......


77 posted on 09/15/2005 10:24:17 PM PDT by Peace will be here soon (Liberal definition of looting: " Self-help Humanitarian Aid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
Well then, if you've never seen it, it must not have happened, right?

Have you measured the velocity and distance at which such an occurrence could take place? If not, and you have never experienced a windshield suddenly covered in snow on the highway while traveling 65, then perhaps you are mistaking your assumptions to be fact.

By the way - I never tailgate - that is as unwise and ignorant as not clearing your car because you are too lazy.
78 posted on 09/15/2005 10:25:01 PM PDT by Time4Atlas2Shrug (Use those bootstraps, cowboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
The nanny states spread

Actually, I would prefer that the state let me deal with the loser in front of me that was to lazy, stupid or irresponsible to clean the snow and ice off the top of their vehicle.

79 posted on 09/15/2005 10:39:28 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Westlander

Actually, much of our legislation IS to control stupidity. Should we remove stop signs and the regulations that accompany such signs? Isn't it obvious that we should all stop at intersections, but some people do not and the results could be bad so we enact some rules to govern such activity.

Your paperboy analogy is silly. I pay for the roadways involuntarily and have a right to use them. The paperboy has no right to my property and to demand safety measures through legislation so he can use my property. It is a private contract that can be broken. What would happen if I decided to stop paying my taxes for the roads because of the fools that are too lazy to wipe snow off of their vehicles?


80 posted on 09/15/2005 10:41:50 PM PDT by Time4Atlas2Shrug (Use those bootstraps, cowboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-217 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson