[absolootezer0]

wasn't the request for a potty break in a different handwriting? looked like the request was in one hand writing, the response bush was writing was totally different

[jw777]

More of the same MSM B.S.

If Clinton had exused himself for a BJ, he'd be a hero to the MSM. come to think of it. He probably did.

[Dooderbutt]

statehealthfacts.org

[craig_eddy]

raises questions about overall perception of the U.S.

Of course, what Bill C. did with his private parts in the Oval Office was no big deal. But President Bush having the audacity to have to go pee, that defames our image.

Riiiiiiiiight.

[frankjr]

I must be missing something. How is the Washington Post going to be able to write an entire "news" story about this?

[petitfour]

Talk about rude. Kick the Reuters contingent out of the WH press corps. Were they hoping to catch the president saying something about someone at the meeting?????

I think the note is rather humorous. And the POTUS should know that someone could catch it on camera. I must assume that he did not care. I wonder how many photogs actually could read Kerry's cue cards during the debates, but they refused to further embarrass him.

[Bahbah]

an accidental photo of President Bush at the United Nations

LOL. I once took an accidental photo of the sky when I dropped my camera.

[NickatNite2003]

What a bunch of liars! What was he doing taking pictures of what *anyone* at that table was writing notes about?
What if it had been something of a secret and sensitive nature?

Rats have *no* class...or honesty...

"OMG! President Bush actually has to use a bathroom!"

[Phantom Lord]

I've seen the picture many times today. I could be wrong but I believe that someone wrote the note and gave it to the President and in the photo President Bush is responding to that person.

Compare the writing on the note to that of President Bush's. It doesn't match.

[katagious]

What's bothering me about this ....incident...is that photographers are using zoom lenses to eavesdrop on the Presidents confidential notes. I think that's an outrage.

[chs68]

"As for transmitting the photo, Hershorn says, "There was no malicious intent. That's not what we do.""

Two words:

Puh Leaz.

[azhenfud]

Rooters has their nose in the mud again.

[atomicpossum]

As for transmitting the photo, Hershorn says, "There was no malicious intent. That's not what we do."

HA.

[M. Thatcher]

It's a private matter.

It doesn't affect how he does his job.

Let him get back to doing the work of the American people.

[Petruchio]

So, Reuters admits that President Bush is not full of Sh**!

[Billthedrill]

What was he supposed to do, raise one finger? This one has me absolutely baffled. The Secret Service can do some pretty amazing things, but last I heard they couldn't take a leak for you.

It evidently strikes some people that this detracts from Bush's dignity, or the "25 pictures" comment wouldn't have occurred to the speaker even in jest. What does it say about you when you hate somebody that much?

[COUNTrecount]

“Rick had no idea what he was shooting, or what Bush was writing,”

Because if he had he would have followed the President into the stall and noted how many pieces of toilet paper he used.And then we'd have an envirnmental story about the misuse of our forests.

[aShepard]

He must have been drinking the same brand of ice tea that algore used.

[Recovering_Democrat]

As for transmitting the photo, Hershorn says, "There was no malicious intent. That's not what we do."

This from Reuters, the "news" service that refuses to call terrorists terrorists and also published THIS photo of John Roberts two days ago:



No, no malicious intent. Pure journalism. Right.

[jveritas]

I am very gald that these left wing kooks are our political opponents. They are delusional, stupid, hateful, bitter, and desperate in ways we could have never imagined.