Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Architect Offers Changes to 9/11 Memorial
Associated Press ^ | 9/14/05 | KIMBERLY HEFLING

Posted on 09/14/2005 4:54:48 PM PDT by jimbo123

The architect of the memorial to a plane downed in Pennsylvania on Sept. 11, 2001, said Wednesday he would work to satisfy critics who complained that it honors terrorists with its crescent-shaped design.

Designer Paul Murdoch said he is "somewhat optimistic" that the spirit of the design could be maintained.

"It's a disappointment there is a misinterpretation and a simplistic distortion of this, but if that is a public concern, than that is something we will look to resolve in a way that keeps the essential qualities," Murdoch, 48, of Los Angeles, said in a telephone interview.

Murdoch's design, "Crescent of Embrace," was selected last week during a meeting of the Flight 93 Advisory Commission from five narrowed down from 1,011.

The recommendation of the 15-member jury consisting of design professionals and family and community members still needs to be approved by the Interior Department.

Its shape is a circle broken by the flight pattern of the plane, which supporters have said follows the topography of the crash site.

Chris Martin, spokesman for Flight 93 National Memorial, said Wednesday family members and federal advisory commission members turned to Murdoch for assistance.

Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., sent a letter Tuesday to National Park Service Director Fran Mainella saying many have questioned the shape "because of the crescent's prominent use as a symbol in Islam — and the fact that the hijackers were radical Islamists."

Will Adams, spokesman for Tancredo, said Wednesday Tancredo would be happy with the changes only if the crescent shape is removed.

Murdoch said he's not sure exactly what changes he would make.

The memorial also consists of a chapel with 40 metallic wind chimes — one for each victim. It would include pedestrian trails and a roadway to a visitor center and the actual crash site. At the site would be a crescent-shaped cluster of maple trees and a white marble wall inscribed with the victims' names.

"We called it a crescent because it was a curving land form. We called it 'Crescent of Embrace' because of the symbolic gesturing of embracing this place," Murdoch said. "There's no desire to make this a divisive memorial."

Gordon Felt, of Remsen, N.Y., whose brother Edward Felt was killed on Flight 93, said he called Tancredo's office and said Tancredo should have held off on his criticism.

"I wish he would come out to Somerset and see topography of the land," Felt said.

Felt said it is natural for the design to evolve.

"I think the topography of the land would really dictate there would be some kind of arc," Felt said.

Flight 93 was flying to San Francisco from Newark, N.J., when it was hijacked and crashed 65 miles outside Pittsburgh. The official 9/11 Commission report said the hijackers crashed it as passengers tried to take control of the cockpit.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; 911memorial; architecture; flight93; flight93memorial; fourthanniversary; redcrescent
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last
Nice work to everyone who called.
1 posted on 09/14/2005 4:54:49 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

The new design will be a crescent with a star.


2 posted on 09/14/2005 4:56:16 PM PDT by linear (Repeal the Second Law of Thermodynamics!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everyone

Not good enough. We don't WANT to "keep the spirit of the design."


3 posted on 09/14/2005 4:57:22 PM PDT by California Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

I personally didn't take issue with the design, but I did have a problem with the name. But Flight 93 families are involved with the design, so in my view their votes are the ones that really count.


4 posted on 09/14/2005 4:57:40 PM PDT by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Good! I wonder what he's going to change it to?

I think he knew perfectly well what it looked like, and in fact I read an interview with him where he described his wretched insult of a design as a "sign of reconciliation." And all the Muslim organizations from CAIR on down have rushed forward to support him. Sorry, the innocent act doesn't work.


5 posted on 09/14/2005 4:57:54 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Let's see what he comes up with first.


6 posted on 09/14/2005 4:58:16 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
"It's a disappointment there is a misinterpretation and a simplistic distortion of this, but if that is a public concern, than that is something we will look to resolve in a way that keeps the essential qualities," Murdoch, 48, of Los Angeles, said in a telephone interview.

Darn hoi polloi.....daring to criticize their more intelligent superiors!

7 posted on 09/14/2005 4:58:30 PM PDT by MarcusTulliusCicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Here is the original design.


8 posted on 09/14/2005 4:58:48 PM PDT by rocksblues (I support the war on terror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop

I don't think the families matter, quite frankly. They probably have varying opinions on it, in any case.

This is an American monument to American people who did something very important in a time of crisis. The monument is for us to remember them, not for their families or their families' memory of them.


9 posted on 09/14/2005 4:59:27 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: linear
Yeah. Somehow I'm having just a *leeetle* bit of a problem believing this guy.

BTW, the "Chapel" was exactly where a star would be...

10 posted on 09/14/2005 4:59:36 PM PDT by null and void (Does my life *really* need a sarcasm tag????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Blogosphere and pajama people strike again:)


11 posted on 09/14/2005 4:59:54 PM PDT by not_apathetic_anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

I doubt this clown will remove the crescent. He's better than us. He's an tax funded artiste!


12 posted on 09/14/2005 5:00:12 PM PDT by dennisw (***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

I agree with you. It is too obviously an Islamic symbol for him to act ignorant.


13 posted on 09/14/2005 5:00:18 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Make it a pentagon minus one side.


14 posted on 09/14/2005 5:01:21 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarcusTulliusCicero

You beat me to it...us "simpletons" just don't get the sophistication. How telling is THAT?


15 posted on 09/14/2005 5:01:45 PM PDT by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Wanna put some money on that???


16 posted on 09/14/2005 5:02:56 PM PDT by null and void (Does my life *really* need a sarcasm tag????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

That is wrong--a red crescent by accident? I think not.


17 posted on 09/14/2005 5:02:58 PM PDT by lp boonie (Good judgement comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: null and void

This architect thought he'd sneak in his sick joke for all his artist friends and it didn't work.


18 posted on 09/14/2005 5:03:02 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Whether or not the symbolism was intentional, it will still be seen as an Islamic overtone, particularly in the radical Muslim world. I don't want any sort of honor, recognition, or memorialization of the hijackers or their ilk, intentional or not. I don't want any celebrations in the hearts of the proponents of this twisted philosophy.


19 posted on 09/14/2005 5:03:11 PM PDT by atomicpossum (Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

a broken circle can symblolize a lot of things. fuhgawdsake, too many cooks spoil the broth. just rebuild the freaking thing -- assuming, of course it makes sense to economically. I'm sure the replacement cost of those towers is astronomical and probably couldn't repaid at reasonable rents were it not for concessions and subsidies. so, maybe it should be a park for a few years, until there's demand for the space again. right now it seems like they can't give away office space in the financial district.


20 posted on 09/14/2005 5:03:44 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (we don't need no stinkin' tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson