Skip to comments.
Gay rights advocates still trying to change Schwarzenegger's mind
www.sfgate.com ^
| Tuesday, September 13, 2005
| Wyatt Buchanan
Posted on 09/13/2005 7:32:09 PM PDT by DirtyHarryY2K
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Everyone from California should FReep Ahhnuld!
To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...
2
posted on
09/13/2005 7:33:48 PM PDT
by
DirtyHarryY2K
(http://soapboxharry.blogspot.com/)
To: DirtyHarryY2K
Arnold won't mess with these girly-men. They delude themselves thinking leaving it to the last minute will change his mind. I love the smell of VETO's in the morning.
3
posted on
09/13/2005 7:39:10 PM PDT
by
BigFinn
To: DirtyHarryY2K
Activists and politicians upset by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's vow to veto the same-sex marriage bill that the state Legislature passed last week...You mean he hasn't done it yet? Can't find his pen or something?
4
posted on
09/13/2005 7:40:32 PM PDT
by
inquest
(FTAA delenda est)
To: BigFinn
They're sure afraid to send it to his desk, that's a good sign, unless his wife and her family hide his pen..
5
posted on
09/13/2005 7:43:51 PM PDT
by
DirtyHarryY2K
(http://soapboxharry.blogspot.com/)
To: inquest
They are democrats. They don't respect the laws of the state, which allow the governor to veto. So they are holding up their own bill for as long as they can before sending it to him, in the hopes that in the meantime they can persuade him to change his mind.
Of course, if he left the state for a minute, the lt. Governor would take over and they'd send the bill and sign it.
I note the story didn't seem to say that, maybe they are hoping Arnold doesn't know this. (I presume this is still true in California).
Anybody know if Arnold had any important scheduled appearances in other states in the next week?
To: DirtyHarryY2K
7
posted on
09/13/2005 7:51:44 PM PDT
by
DirtyHarryY2K
(http://soapboxharry.blogspot.com/)
To: CharlesWayneCT
Good point! Should be looked into.
8
posted on
09/13/2005 7:53:39 PM PDT
by
DirtyHarryY2K
(http://soapboxharry.blogspot.com/)
To: DirtyHarryY2K
You know, Arnold will actually be doing the Gay Rights activists a favor: by vetoing the bill, he'll prevent the public backlash that would probably result in consequences that gays wouldn't like very much at all.
9
posted on
09/13/2005 7:53:55 PM PDT
by
sourcery
("Compelling State Interest" is the refuge of judicial activist traitors against the Constitution)
To: sourcery
by vetoing the bill, he'll prevent the public backlash that would probably result in consequences that gays wouldn't like very much at all. It wasn't vetoed in Massachusetts and there wasn't a backlash, they just started handing out sodo-marriage license and pro homo "diversity" literature to the grade schoolers.
10
posted on
09/13/2005 8:06:03 PM PDT
by
DirtyHarryY2K
(http://soapboxharry.blogspot.com/)
To: DirtyHarryY2K
LOL!!!!! The sniveling homosexual activists are enraged!
11
posted on
09/13/2005 8:13:05 PM PDT
by
DBeers
(†)
To: DirtyHarryY2K
I don't think Arnie is going to change his mind about the veto. He knows how we voted, and he knows how he got elected.
12
posted on
09/13/2005 8:14:11 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(It is all my fault okay?)
To: DirtyHarryY2K
Hope he holds to his campaign promises. The sodomy lobby wants to overturn the will of the people and I can guarantee you they voted for Ahnuuld because he said he wouldn't pass such trash.
13
posted on
09/13/2005 8:27:12 PM PDT
by
Clint N. Suhks
(If you don't like Jesus, you can go to hell.)
To: DirtyHarryY2K
Good idea. Hope Arnold hangs tough.
To: DirtyHarryY2K
I'm glad Texas only lets legislators meet for 140 days every two years.
15
posted on
09/13/2005 8:38:17 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
To: Paleo Conservative
I hear that. They still manage to foul things up!
16
posted on
09/13/2005 8:55:01 PM PDT
by
DirtyHarryY2K
(http://soapboxharry.blogspot.com/)
To: DirtyHarryY2K
I hear that. They still manage to foul things up! Sometimes, but we don't have to worry about the governor being out of state when a bill gets passed by the legislature and the lieutenant governor gets ot sign legislation.
17
posted on
09/13/2005 8:58:00 PM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
To: DirtyHarryY2K
How come he hasn't signed it yet? What's holding it up? anyone know? Seriously does anyone know. No jokes or remarks welcome.
18
posted on
09/13/2005 9:13:07 PM PDT
by
cubreporter
(I trust Rush. He has done more for our country than anyone can ever imagine. He is solid as a rock)
To: DirtyHarryY2K
>>
Everyone from California should FReep Ahhnuld! <<
Why? The Arnoldbots said all social issues were "irrevelant" in California and the ONLY important thing is that Ahnuld will magically "bring the buisnesses back" and "deliever" the state to other Republicans.
::snickers::
19
posted on
09/13/2005 9:21:41 PM PDT
by
BillyBoy
(Find out the TRUTH about the Chicago Democrat Machine's "Best Friend" in the GOP : www.nolahood.com)
To: inquest
If you had read the article you would know that he cannot veto the bill until it is physically in his possession, and they are delaying sending it to him until the Sept. 23 deadline, just for that reason.
20
posted on
09/14/2005 5:28:12 AM PDT
by
Ronin
(When the fox gnaws.... SMILE!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson