Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Civil Rights Act; Need help

Posted on 09/13/2005 5:44:30 PM PDT by OldBlondBabe

Can anyone provide a link showing how the House and Senate voted for the Civil Rights Act?

Thanks so much.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: golookitup; notnewslazybitch; vanityinnews

1 posted on 09/13/2005 5:44:31 PM PDT by OldBlondBabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OldBlondBabe

http://www.google.com


2 posted on 09/13/2005 5:46:24 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldBlondBabe

Vote totals:
The Original House Version: 290-130
The Senate Version: 73-27
The Senate Version, as voted on by the House: 289-126

By Party: The Original House Version:
Democratic Party: 153-96
Republican Party: 138-34

The Senate Version:
Democratic Party: 46-22
Republican Party: 27-6

The Senate Version, voted on by the House:
Democratic Party: 153-91
Republican Party: 136-35

By Party and Region:

The Original House Version:
Southern Democrats: 7-87
Southern Republicans: 0-10
Northern Democrats: 145-9
Northern Republicans: 138-24

The Senate Version:
Southern Democrats: 1-21
Southern Republicans: 0-1
Northern Democrats: 46-1
Northern Republicans: 27-5


3 posted on 09/13/2005 5:47:20 PM PDT by xcamel (...Eats moonbats for lunch and feeds liberals to the hounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldBlondBabe
1964 Civil Rights Act
4 posted on 09/13/2005 5:48:09 PM PDT by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldBlondBabe
BTW:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964

5 posted on 09/13/2005 5:48:29 PM PDT by xcamel (...Eats moonbats for lunch and feeds liberals to the hounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldBlondBabe

Civil Rights Act of 1964

VOTE STATS

Vote totals:

The Original House Version: 290-130
The Senate Version: 73-27
The Senate Version, as voted on by the House: 289-126

By Party: The Original House Version:

Democratic Party: 153-96
Republican Party: 138-34

The Senate Version:

Democratic Party: 46-22
Republican Party: 27-6

The Senate Version, voted on by the House:

Democratic Party: 153-91
Republican Party: 136-35

By Party and Region:

The Original House Version:

Southern Democrats: 7-87
Southern Republicans: 0-10
Northern Democrats: 145-9
Northern Republicans: 138-24

The Senate Version:

Southern Democrats: 1-21
Southern Republicans: 0-1
Northern Democrats: 46-1
Northern Republicans: 27-5

Major Features of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Title I
Barred unequal application of voter registration requirements, but did not abolish literacy tests sometimes used to disqualify African Americans and poor white voters.

Title II
Outlawed discrimination in hotels, motels, restaurants, theaters, and all other public accommodations engaged in interstate commerce; exempted private clubs without defining "private," thereby allowing a loophole..

Title III
Encouraged the desegregation of public schools and authorized the U. S. Attorney General to file suits to force desegregation, but did not authorize busing as a means to overcome segregation based on residence.

Title IV
Authorized but did not require withdrawal of federal funds from programs which practiced discriminations.

Title VII
Title VII outlaws discrimination in employment in any business on the basis of race, national origin, sex, or religion. Title VII also prohibits retaliation against employees who oppose such unlawful discrimination. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforces Title VII. The EEOC investigates, mediates, and sometimes files lawsuits on behalf of employees. Title VII also provides that an individual can bring a private lawsuit. Importantly, an individual must file a complaint of discrimination with the EEOC within 180 days of learning of the discrimination or the individual may lose the right to file a lawsuit. Title VII only applies to employers with fifteen or more employees. In the late 1970s courts began holding that sexual harassment is prohibited under the Act. Title VII has been supplemented with legislation prohibiting pregnancy, age, and disability discrimination. Currently there is no federal law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation, however Congress continues to consider the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) which would prohibit sexual orientation employment discrimination.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964


6 posted on 09/13/2005 5:49:36 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldBlondBabe

Do you mean starting in the 1860's?


7 posted on 09/13/2005 5:49:44 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldBlondBabe

The civil Rights Act can mean the 1964 Act, but there's a few other civil rights acts too. Try Findlaw.com and http://www.law.cornell.edu/ if no one has already posted the one you mean.

But it's not 1995; it's 2005. By now, you should be able to find it yourself.


8 posted on 09/13/2005 5:51:21 PM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

BTW, here's the original Ku Klux Klan Act, from a great resource I found today: http://education.harpweek.com/KKKHearings/AppendixA.htm

Click the other links on this page for related documents.


9 posted on 09/13/2005 5:53:50 PM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OldBlondBabe

If you use Google and also look under Congressional Quaterly with your search, you'll find an excellent article from that time that castigates the Dems for their failure to support this act...and the '58 and '60 Civil Rights Acts.


10 posted on 09/13/2005 5:55:02 PM PDT by cwb (Liberalism is the opiate of the *asses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Wow, I wasn't even looking for it and I'm impressed. Thanks for the post. Just goes to show when you want to know something, ask a Freeper.


11 posted on 09/13/2005 5:58:49 PM PDT by infidel29 ("By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail." --Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: infidel29

Or a librarian. ;-)


12 posted on 09/13/2005 6:08:54 PM PDT by kellynch (I am excessively diverted ~~Jane Austen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kellynch

"Or a librarian. ;-)"

Hey! :)


13 posted on 09/13/2005 6:11:40 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kellynch
Or a librarian. ;-)

I not so sure of that, my sister is a librarian and I'll bet she couldn't have found that info so quickly.

14 posted on 09/13/2005 6:18:57 PM PDT by infidel29 ("By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail." --Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: infidel29

I am, and I could have.


15 posted on 09/13/2005 6:45:35 PM PDT by kellynch (I am excessively diverted ~~Jane Austen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kellynch

I kind of thought you were defending the job as it were, my sister is mostly apolitical with a slight tilt to the left (state job) so I imagine someone with a more highly tuned mind, such as yourself, would have an easier job finding the facts that don't shine so brightly on the left.


16 posted on 09/13/2005 7:05:21 PM PDT by infidel29 ("By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail." --Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: infidel29
Thanks for the clarification.

A while back, David Brooks came to speak at my church. He said that the 3 biggest donor groups to liberal causes were librarians, lawyers and teachers.

Well, my mother and I are librarians (Mom's retired and I'm not currently employed in that profession, but it's still what I am in my heart), my brother is a lawyer and my father is a retired college professor.

And we're all Republicans. My brother lists to the left a bit (he married a liberal and it appears that he's susceptible to persuasion), but the rest of us are "real" Republicans through and through.

17 posted on 09/13/2005 7:23:58 PM PDT by kellynch (I am excessively diverted ~~Jane Austen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kellynch
...3 biggest donor groups to liberal causes were librarians, lawyers and teachers.

Uh-oh.... my family is full of those. Let's see both parents were teachers and democrats , but thankfully they're recovering.

Their children though have all the branches of criminality covered, my oldest sister(R) is a lawyer, next one(D) is a forensic chemist in the State police crime lab, and youngest(?) is a librarian in a prison. Lawyer, cop, and jailor... I'm just judgemental.

18 posted on 09/13/2005 7:33:11 PM PDT by infidel29 ("By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail." --Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jdm

That's nice. Now see if you can find a roll call of the vote. ;-)


19 posted on 09/14/2005 6:52:44 AM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson