Replies

Not a smear. Eckleburg told us that Christian Reconstructionists do not believe in the application of the death penalty for crimes other than homicides. Then it turns out the publicity director of the leading CR foundation admits their theology allows the stoning to death of incorrigible children, but says they haven't written a word about that in years (he appears to be puzzled that such a thing would stick in people's minds). Eckleburg has claimed we are taking quotes out of context. But I posted an entire article about Chalcedon Institute from a public source, in which this admission was made.

All I've seen from her has been attempts to deny that CR preaches any of the stuff it demonstrably does preach. She has, in other words, spent her time here defending the movement. And you and bluepistolero have in turn defended her. Even prior to that, I'd inferred she was in fact a Reconstructionist. And, rather than a straightforward 'no I'm not', she said asked me if I wanted to stone her for it. No I don't. That's their schtick. But I do want to expose them.

It's a free country, at least until the CRs take over. I don't press people for public denials they don't want to make. Dissociate yourself from these people, or not, I don't care. But don't claim victim status because people draw attention to your own words. Take responsibility for them.