All I've seen from her has been attempts to deny that CR preaches any of the stuff it demonstrably does preach. She has, in other words, spent her time here defending the movement. And you and bluepistolero have in turn defended her. Even prior to that, I'd inferred she was in fact a Reconstructionist. And, rather than a straightforward 'no I'm not', she said asked me if I wanted to stone her for it. No I don't. That's their schtick. But I do want to expose them.
It's a free country, at least until the CRs take over. I don't press people for public denials they don't want to make. Dissociate yourself from these people, or not, I don't care. But don't claim victim status because people draw attention to your own words. Take responsibility for them.
That is a misstatement of fact, Professor, and you know it. I posted, "I am not a Christian Reconstructionist; I am a Presbyterian."
And you obviously read this post because in response you followed up with the statement to someone that "she could be a Presbyterian because CR was begun by the Presbyterians." (paraphrasing here)I think it was you who even mentioned Van Til.
Recall?
No CR I've read has ever advocated stoning children, or anyone. But Christian perspectives are assailed on all sides. As God wills. If you'd like to read what someone like Greg Bahnsen, a student of Van Til, wrote about Scripture, Christianity and God's purpose, a good place to find complete articles is here:
A good one to start with might be:
You are correct about one thing, however. A Christian worldview where all kneel to the Triune God of Scripture does seem to be lagging. It is a loathsome prospect to those who deny it. I have faith, however, it is but a momentary stagnation.
No King but Christ.
"We are destroying speculations and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God, and we are taking every thought captive to the obedience of Christ." (2 Cor 10:5)
What's objectively wrong with the death penalty for crimes other than homicides?