Nagin will probably be selling them out of the back door of his office...
according to our own hflynn, taking guns away from the law abiding citizens is okay because there are criminal out there using guns to break the law!
Oh, and the police are part of the mililia, too, so they can take away guns. Whatever that has to do with anything.
PING!
The 2nd is one right the ACLU apparently doesn't mind seeing slip away.
When the DemonKats run the show, they make up the rules as they go along, don't you know ...
That video was posted here on FR somewhere. The day after I saw it, I saw a Fox News headline that said "No Force Used Yet in Gun Confiscations". Uhm... the video SAID Fox News, IIRC? Anyone else remember it?
I would like some accountability on this issue. Personally, I would like to see some indictments.
If anyone can show me in the constitution where a hurricane or a flood gives the government the authority to wholesale confiscate the firearms of otherwise law abiding citizens, I'd like to see it.
Been going on for years under domestic violence laws. Many a scorned woman has made an unsubstantiated allegation in order to ensure her boyfriend or husband loses his guns. Judges believe that it is better that 99% of men falsely accused be deprived of their 2nd Amendment rights than 1% commit violence with a gun. The Second Amendment is dead in many ways. All one needs to do is claim the confiscation is being done "for women" or "for the children."
I thought that 'CCRKBA' stood for 'Central Colorado Roadkill Beeber Association'.
This is more outrageous than other outrages coming from this cesspool.
I only regret I have so few fingers for so many guns.
mc
FYI
FYI
The gun confiscators now have their very own nice gun collections
I expect this will happen with increasing frequency in the future. And I don't like it.
Well, somebody's stepping up to the plate...
Dimquest found this:
La. Stat., title 14, § 329.6. It provides:
Section F.
Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section, except in an imminent life threatening situation nothing herein shall restrict any uniformed employee of a licensed private security company, acting within the scope of employment, from entering and remaining in an area where an emergency has been declared.
The provisions of this Subsection shall apply if the licensed private security company submits a list of employees and their assignment to be allowed into the area, to the Louisiana State Board of Private Security Examiners, which shall forward the list to the chief law enforcement office of the parish and, if different, the agency in charge of the scene.
Is there such a thing as a civil rights suit under § 1983 for attorney's fees against the government when they take away our second amendment rights? I would see a class action there is enough people actually were forced to cough them up.
The first gun control laws were proposed and enacted by Democrats to prevent Blacks (Negro's at that time) from obtaining weapons.
The Blacks (Seesh, should I call them Negro's? This constant changing of the names by the RATS is confusing), anyway the Negro's were using them to protect themselves and their families against the KKK (read future Democrat Senators).
The fact that they would again focus on minorities ability to defend themselves against criminals surprises no one at FR, I'm sure. That's what elitists do.
I'm glad someone is calling for an investigation.