Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SAN FRANCISCO Pro-gay approach tried on battleship skeptics
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 9/7/05 | Wyatt Buchanan

Posted on 09/07/2005 2:27:18 PM PDT by dukeman

There's a new battle plan for bringing the battleship Iowa to San Francisco.

The battleship's supporters now hope to gain the support of city leaders by turning part of the vessel into a museum about the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy and the contributions of gays, lesbians, ethnic minorities and women to the military.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: barf; dontaskdonttell; homosexualagenda; museum; sf; ussiowa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Un-believable
1 posted on 09/07/2005 2:27:20 PM PDT by dukeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dukeman
I guess all the sarcastic comments about turning it into a homo bar, were not that far fetched.
2 posted on 09/07/2005 2:29:23 PM PDT by Battle Hymn of the Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

Better it goes up river to Stockton. To hell with San Francisco.


3 posted on 09/07/2005 2:29:38 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

I thought it had been decided to move the ship to ... er... was it Stockton? Or Sacramento? I forgot the city name, but it was somewhere inland from San Fagsisco.


4 posted on 09/07/2005 2:29:54 PM PDT by MarineBrat (When it rains, New Orleans makes its own gravy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman
ethnic minorities and women to the military.

Why involve these people?

5 posted on 09/07/2005 2:30:02 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (The repenting soul is the victorious soul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

It's Bush's fau...Nevermind.


6 posted on 09/07/2005 2:30:26 PM PDT by Pylon (Remember boys, flies spread disease, so keep yours closed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

I would rather it were turned into scrap metal than to see a proud ship used for such a purpose.


7 posted on 09/07/2005 2:32:23 PM PDT by SE Mom (God Bless those who serve..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

I strongly suspect that the U.S. Navy will not go along with turning this glorious battleship into a sleazy monument for gay rights...


8 posted on 09/07/2005 2:32:24 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman
This is like some sort of sick joke. The linked article doesn’t mention the 47 crewmen who died in an explosion aboard the Iowa. Depending on which investigation you believe, that explosion may have been triggered intentionally by a sailor turned suicidal because of the disintegration of a homosexual shipboard romance.

Let's have a rainbow celebration!

9 posted on 09/07/2005 2:34:08 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

The Gay Left Lobby seems to control the agenda of the People's Republic of California.


10 posted on 09/07/2005 2:35:18 PM PDT by Rosemont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

It would be wonderful to host such a historic ship in the Bay Area, next to the Pampanito WWII sub, paddle wheel and other Tall Ships.

Its hard to imagine getting the support of the city's activist board without this "compromise". I only hope that they can be balanced in the presentation.


11 posted on 09/07/2005 2:35:23 PM PDT by Wiseghy (Discontent is the want of self-reliance: it is infirmity of will. – Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Actually, the Navy later quietly determined in drop tests that "overramming" the powder into the gun's breech is what most likely caused the explosion.


12 posted on 09/07/2005 2:37:42 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dukeman
I don't think this is going to happen. SF in the past has banned recruiters from visiting schools; tried to ban and smear JROTC units; and changed the name of Army Street to Martin Luther King Jr Blvd (then had to pay replace all the freeway signs because MLK Jr Blvd wouldn't fit on the exisiting signs.)

It's about as anti-military as it gets.

13 posted on 09/07/2005 2:39:36 PM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman
Do these freaks ever think above the waist???
14 posted on 09/07/2005 2:40:10 PM PDT by Millee (Earth First! We'll log the other planets later!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

I suggest that the Iowa have one last gunnery practice on SF as it enters SF Bay on its way to retirement!


15 posted on 09/07/2005 2:42:19 PM PDT by texson66 ("Tyranny is yielding to the lust of the governing." - Lord Moulton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

Everyone here hold your fire until you give this some consideration. Around the time of the Iowa explosion, we had a more serious military problem, the utter uselessness and corruption of Naval Intelligence, which first tried to blame the explosion as sabotage by a rebuffed gay sailor.
Testimony shot that explanation out of the water and an apology was issued to one of the families as another poster explained.
My recollection of what investigators think went wrong is that they were experimenting with smaller explosive packages in an effort to save money.


16 posted on 09/07/2005 2:43:41 PM PDT by jjmcgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
The navy investigation came up with the spurned homosexual lover scenario.

A civilian investigation later came up with the overramming powder scenario.

Neither unwelcome ramming scenario was proven to have been the cause, but the conclusion of the civilian investigation became the favored one.

17 posted on 09/07/2005 2:43:56 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Battle Hymn of the Republic
Well, we would not desecrate her in Texas so bring her here. Why is this such an issue? Could it be because they do not like the military there? If they want all kinds of "concessions" to have the privilege of hosting this vessel why can't she come to friendlier waters where she would be honored?
18 posted on 09/07/2005 2:43:58 PM PDT by Leapofaith (I am not a radical conservative --- just a pissed off one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dukeman

There must be a few more port towns more suitable and respectful of the memories of these great ships.


19 posted on 09/07/2005 2:47:30 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

I don't think you should be bringing up overramming in a gay activist thread.


20 posted on 09/07/2005 2:49:40 PM PDT by dukeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson