Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do You Yahoo? - The Chinese Secret Police Evidently Do
Roger L. Simon ^ | 9-06-05 | Roger L. Simon

Posted on 09/06/2005 8:52:24 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy

Greed is apparently infecting some of our best known American-based internet and computer comnpanies to the extent they may be becoming the enablers of fascism.

First we learned Microsoft was cooperating with Chinese authorities in suppressing words like "democracy" in Microsoft's new blogging software. Now we learn the once-trendy Yahoo may be also helping out the Beijing Apparatchiks in an even more insidious manner. According to Reporters Without Borders, they have been aiding the Chinese government in revealing the identities of dissidents!

The text of the verdict in the case of journalist Shi Tao - sentenced in April to 10 years in prison for "divulging state secrets abroad" - shows that Yahoo ! Holdings (Hong Kong) Ltd. provided China's state security authorities with details that helped to identify and convict him, Reporters Without Borders said today.

"We already knew that Yahoo ! collaborates enthusiastically with the Chinese regime in questions of censorship, and now we know it is a Chinese police informant as well," the press freedom organisation said.

"Yahoo ! obviously complied with requests from the Chinese authorities to furnish information regarding an IP address that linked Shi Tao to materials posted online, and the company will yet again simply state that they just conform to the laws of the countries in which they operate," the organisation said. "But does the fact that this corporation operates under Chinese law free it from all ethical considerations ? How far will it go to please Beijing ?"

Reporters Without Borders added : "Information supplied by Yahoo ! led to the conviction of a good journalist who has paid dearly for trying to get the news out. It is one thing to turn a blind eye to the Chinese government's abuses and it is quite another thing to collaborate."

Translated into English by the Dui Hua Foundation (which works to document the cases of Chinese political prisoners), the verdict reveals that Yahoo ! Holdings (Hong Kong) Ltd. provided the Chinese investigating organs with detailed information that apparently enabled them to link Shi's personal e-mail account (huoyan-1989@yahoo.com.cn) and the specific message containing information treated as a "state secret" to the IP address of his computer.

Whoa, if true, this is deeply abhorrent behavior for an American-based multi-national corporation. Reporters sans frontières continues further on:

Yahoo ! and Chinese censorship

For years Yahoo ! has allowed the Chinese version of its search engine to be censored. In 2002, Yahoo ! voluntarily signed the "Public Pledge on Self-Discipline for the China Internet Industry", agreeing to abide by PRC censorship regulations. Searches deemed sensitive by the Chinese authorities such as "Taiwan independence" in Chinese into the Yahoo ! China search engine, retrieve only a limited and approved set of results.

For what it's worth, Pajamas Media is now looking into what role we should be playing in this and how we should react. One thing is certain: no matter how big we become we won't be signing the "Public Pledge on Self-Discipline for the China Internet Industry."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: apparatchiks; gulag; sellout; slavelabor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 09/06/2005 8:52:24 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy
I asked this question before, but it bares repeating: Do you think that Chief Yahoo and Director Jerry Yang had anything to do with this?
2 posted on 09/06/2005 8:54:43 PM PDT by Sthitch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy

Ay! Suggestions for good search engines?


3 posted on 09/06/2005 9:01:21 PM PDT by ROTB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sthitch
Answer is yes.

Yang is amoral and ChiCom appeaser. Sad to say.

4 posted on 09/06/2005 9:01:49 PM PDT by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy
"We already knew that Yahoo ! collaborates enthusiastically with the Chinese regime in questions of censorship, and now we know it is a Chinese police informant as well," the press freedom organisation said.

Gee....a reporter, the Chinese governemt, and Yahoo....talk about trying to pick the worst of three evils...

Yet Yahoo!!!! seems to get my nod as the worst of the bunch, as it's ACTIVELY HELPING the Chinese government crack down on discidents! What scum buckets!

Sadly, my ISP contracts with Yahoo!!!!! for all sorts of goodies, including e-mail. Perhaps it's time to find a new ISP....

5 posted on 09/06/2005 9:07:53 PM PDT by Ronzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy

The notion that profits justify anything is a cancer in conservatism. These are the sort of folks who would gladly sell the Communists rope, so long as someone else was to be hung first.


6 posted on 09/06/2005 9:08:14 PM PDT by U.H. Conservative (http://unhyphenatedconservative.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy

Is this any different from the French who collaborated with the Nazis?


7 posted on 09/06/2005 9:12:16 PM PDT by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy
We need to figure out how real people (as opposed to weenie governments) can once and for all get rid of those damn (in Pat Buchanan's phrasing) chain-smoking communist dwarfs.

Undermine the bastards, put 'em up on lampposts by their necks. Worked in Italy. Worked in Romania. Will work in China.

Enough of this crap. Enough diplomatic pretending.

8 posted on 09/06/2005 9:12:23 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy

Excuuuse me, but isn't the guy who founded Yahoo half Chinese? Hello!


9 posted on 09/06/2005 9:12:57 PM PDT by japaneseghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henderson field

"Is this any different from the French who collaborated with the Nazis?"

Not a lot, no.


10 posted on 09/06/2005 9:14:17 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy (This message prepared with MS-CBS Word 72 software)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy


How is this legal?


11 posted on 09/06/2005 9:14:36 PM PDT by LauraleeBraswell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Slightly Off Topic and ON THE NET...


http://globalpolitician.com/articledes.asp?ID=1174&cid=11&sid=60
"Do You Yahoo? Al-Qaida Does!"
Jeremy Reynalds - 9/7/2005


12 posted on 09/06/2005 9:16:47 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

Cause politicians of both parties like the money from companies that like doing business with China.


13 posted on 09/06/2005 9:17:24 PM PDT by U.H. Conservative (http://unhyphenatedconservative.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All
How long before the Chi-coms demand that Yahoo, google, et al. censure the Internet here -- else they lose business opportunities in Red China?

Can't happen? U.S. corporations are encouraged to pay lobbyists to advocate for Red China in Washington, else their business interest in Red China would suffer, according to Bill Gertz of the Washington Times.

In the past google admited to censuring Second Amendment rights stuff. The last I noticed DU is a news source on google news and I believe that google refuses to include FR.

14 posted on 09/06/2005 9:18:58 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (Hillary is the she in shenanigans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

The overseas subsidiary that did this, Yahoo! Holdings (Hong Kong) Ltd. is a Chinese registered company and is operating under Chinese law. Of course, this is a legal shell game since Yahoo! Holdings (Hong Kong) is effectively under the control of the American parent company.

There should be a way to close this loophole and keep American businesses from selling out American principles.

In many other types of unethical dealings; slave labor or bribery; for example, there are legal provisions for holding American companies accountable for the actions of their foreign subsidiaries. Flagrant human rights abuses should receive at least the same attention.


15 posted on 09/06/2005 9:22:27 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy (This message prepared with MS-CBS Word 72 software)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy


I went to opensecrets.org and yahoo is basically around 50/50 in donations to both parties. Do you know why companies/corporations split their donations 50/50? What's the point?


16 posted on 09/06/2005 9:32:25 PM PDT by LauraleeBraswell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

Just hedging their bets.


17 posted on 09/06/2005 9:36:38 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy (This message prepared with MS-CBS Word 72 software)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy
Indeed, the whole premise that by somehow making the PRC rich that we would make it democratic appears backwards; by making Red China rich, it is instead become more influential, and it is using that baleful influence on our companies to abet the Chicom program of censorship.

We should cease treating Red China as normal trade partner. It's not. China is a vile totalitarian state, not a budding democracy. By making it wealthy, we are only aiding that government in its repression of its people.

18 posted on 09/06/2005 10:36:32 PM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic conspiracy

they ought to be required to isolate any earnings they get from doing so, to the chinese economy. no carry over into american dollars directly or indirectly. so yahoo china can get filthy rich if they must, ratting to the chinese authorities, but they should not be able to use one thin dime of that in america. we will not cash those ious.


19 posted on 09/06/2005 10:41:43 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
Indeed, the whole premise that by somehow making the PRC rich that we would make it democratic appears backwards; by making Red China rich, it is instead become more influential, and it is using that baleful influence on our companies to abet the Chicom program of censorship.

yup and that is the proof. the answer should be that this money is de jure dirty and can not be allowed to purchase anything in america, and anything purchased with it can not be allowed to come into america.

20 posted on 09/06/2005 10:45:27 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson