Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N.O. Levee effectiveness during 1998's Hurricane Georges and completion date...2013
Army Corps of Engineers, New Orleans District ^ | 4-16-1999 | ??

Posted on 09/06/2005 11:51:02 AM PDT by OXENinFLA

NEW ORLEANS --

Even though Hurricane Georges was a near-miss for New Orleans, projects built by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and its local sponsors prevented an estimated $749 million of damages from the September 1998 storm in the region of Lake Pontchartrain alone.

The damages prevented are for the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Hurricane Protection project, which is in four parishes and lies between the Mississippi River and Lakes Pontchartrain and Borgne. Construction began in 1967 and is years from completion. The damages prevented are for the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Hurricane Protection project, which is in four parishes and lies between the Mississippi River and Lakes Pontchartrain and Borgne. Construction began in 1967 and is years from completion.

Economists of the Corps' New Orleans district base their estimates of flood damages prevented on property loss that would have occurred without Corps projects.

The cumulative total is estimated at $9.69 billion for flood damages prevented by the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity project, which was authorized after Hurricane Betsy ravaged the area in September 1965. The cumulative damages prevented, however, represent only 1983-98 inclusive, the period for which data is available.

"During Hurricane Georges, our project not only worked, it demonstrated its worthiness as a public investment in dollars," said Col. William L. Conner, commander of the New Orleans District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

"The $749 million of damages prevented by the Lake Pontchartrain project in 1998 alone exceed the expected total cost of $732 million upon completion in 2013," Conner said. "Most of the project is built, but clearly we have more work to do."

The work completed ranges from 90 percent in Orleans Parish to 20 percent in the project's newest area, St. Charles Parish. The project also protects St. Bernard and Jefferson parishes.

The Lake Pontchartrain project has 80 miles of levees and 17.9 miles of floodwalls. The average levee is 16 feet above sea level. It is designed to protect the New Orleans area from hurricanes with the destructive force of Betsy, a fast-moving Category 3 storm.

The Corps is contributing $520 million. The remaining $212 million is being paid by the four levee districts that are the local sponsors: The Orleans Levee District, the Lake Borgne Basin & Levee District, the East Jefferson Levee District, and the Pontchartrain Levee District.

The Corps at present does not develop estimates of flood damages prevented by other hurricane-protection projects in the New Orleans District. The largest is the West Bank - Vicinity of New Orleans Hurricane Protection Project, whose origin dates from the Water Resources Development Act of 1986.

The West Bank project is estimated to cost $294 million, with completion in 2018. The project is located on the west bank of the Mississippi River in Jefferson, Orleans and Plaquemines parishes. The Corps is contributing $192 million and the local sponsor, the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, $102 million.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: katrina; levee
It doesn't look like money was a problem in getting these levees completed, it just looks like it take time to build these things.

And they were never built to withstand over a CAT 3.

1 posted on 09/06/2005 11:51:03 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
Must read PING...
2 posted on 09/06/2005 11:52:01 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

btt


3 posted on 09/06/2005 11:53:04 AM PDT by Ciexyz (Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
Clinton saved the city, but Bush couldn't.

Hmmmm....

< / lunacy >

4 posted on 09/06/2005 11:56:40 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

How amazing, and how fraught with opportunity for graft and corruption, is it that there is a separate board for each levee? I would guess that, without that, the actual cost of constructing these things could be cut by half or more.


5 posted on 09/06/2005 11:59:43 AM PDT by Bahbah (Tim Russert is a poopy-head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

I'd like to know what eventually happened to this proposal back in 1998.

http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-IMPACT/1998/June/Day-23/i16642.htm

I've hit a dead end in my search for the outcome.

There has been some discussion here on FR that the Clinton admin denied funding for this project, which would have shored up the levees against a CAT 4 or 5 hurricane.

Only discussion, no proof.


6 posted on 09/06/2005 12:02:54 PM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
[Quotes below are from Lt. Gen. Carl Strock, Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Chief of Engineers, and are excerpted from his remarks during a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Special Briefing for the media via conference call on Thursday, September 1, 2005 at 1 p.m. EDT. A full transcript is available from the Public Affairs Office at (202) 761-0011.]

There have been suggestions that inadequate funding for levee projects delayed their completion and resulted in the flooding of New Orleans.

GEN. STROCK: "In fact, the levee failures we saw were in areas of the projects that were at their full project design... So that part of the project was in place, and had this project been fully complete ... [West Bank, Southeast Louisiana, and Lake Ponchartrain] it's my opinion, based on the intensity of this storm, that the flooding of the Central Business District and the French Quarter would still have occurred. So I do not see that the level of funding is really a contributing factor in this case."

There have also been suggestions that the Corps of Engineers was unable to fully fund flood control needs in New Orleans or elsewhere because funding was diverted to the Global War on Terror.

GEN. STROCK: "Let me also address the issue of the general impact of the war in Iraq on civil works funding. We've seen some suggestions that our budget has been affected by the war. I can also say that I do not see that to be the case. If you look at the historical levels of funding for the Corps of Engineers from the pre-war levels back to 1992, '91, before we actually got into this, you'll see that the level of funding has been fairly stable throughout that period. So I think we would see that our funding levels would have dropped off if that were the case; so I do not see that as an issue that is relevant to the discussion of the flood protection of the City of New Orleans."

Finally, some believe that New Orleans flooded because there were inadequate coastal wetlands in Southern Louisiana to absorb the storm surge.

GEN. STROCK: "Again, my assessment in this case is that any loss of wetlands in the barrier islands associated with those processes did not have a significant impact on this event. I say this because the storm track took it east of the City of New Orleans, and most of those barrier islands and marshlands are located to the south and west of the city; so the storm did not track through that direction anyway, and I don't think that that was a contributing factor in the situation."

7 posted on 09/06/2005 12:05:19 PM PDT by Kryptonite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah
How are the levee failures Bush's fault if the levees:


- Were 90% completed in 1999.

- Not slated to be complete until 2013.

&

- Never designed to withstand over a CAT 3 hurricane.


Any DU Trolls want to take this on?
8 posted on 09/06/2005 12:06:03 PM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
How are the levee failures Bush's fault

Well, they don't need no steenking facts, now do they.

9 posted on 09/06/2005 12:19:27 PM PDT by Bahbah (Tim Russert is a poopy-head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marblehead17

ping


10 posted on 09/06/2005 12:32:00 PM PDT by marblehead17 (I love it when a plan comes together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

The levees weren't due to be completed until 2013? Well'll never see that in the MSM.


11 posted on 09/06/2005 12:53:03 PM PDT by Peach (South Carolina is praying for our Gulf coast citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Funds diverted for the war left the Corps of Engineers only 20% of the funding to protect New Orleans from flooding from Lake Pontchartrain.

" On June 18, 2004, the Corps’ project manager, Al Naomi, told the Times-Picayune: "the levees are sinking. ….If we don’t get the money to raise them, we can’t stay ahead of the settlement.""
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001051313

Inspite of warnings about the coming hurricane season, the administration made budget cuts in flood control and hurricane funding for New Orleans.

We have bridges built to no where in the pork transportation bill just enacted and now BILLIONS more needed because of governmental incompetency .

Just pay up and be glad it was not your town THIS TIME


12 posted on 09/06/2005 12:53:30 PM PDT by RnMomof7 (Sola Scriptura,Sola Christus,Sola Gratia,Sola Fide,Soli Deo Gloria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Inspite of warnings about the coming hurricane season, the administration made budget cuts in flood control and hurricane funding for New Orleans.

Show me.

I want the bill number, I want who proposed the amendment to change the $100MIL to $42MIL, and I want who voted for the amendment.

But this point is a non sequitur, there's no there there. That cut was for the 2006 budget.

Are you saying that if the ACOE had gotten all of the $100MIL 100% of the levee construction would have been completed by the time Katrina hit? And even if it was 100% complete the levees were not desiged to handle a storm over a CAT3.

If you really want to lay blame, blame the Congress from 1968 that decided the levees should only be built to handle a CAT3.

13 posted on 09/06/2005 2:33:19 PM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson