Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5 Percent of D.C. Homes Have Loaded or Unlocked Guns
WTOP News ^ | Tuesday, Sep. 6, 2005 - 11:48 AM | Associated Press

Posted on 09/06/2005 11:40:36 AM PDT by RobertP

5 Percent of D.C. Homes Have Loaded or Unlocked Guns Updated: Tuesday, Sep. 6, 2005 - 11:48 AM

WASHINGTON (AP) - The District may have a high number of gun-related crimes, but according to a new report it has the lowest number of homes with loaded and unlocked guns. A study published in the journal Pediatrics finds that only 5 percent of D.C. homes keep such guns around. Wyoming had the highest number. Thirty-three percent of that state's adults said they kept firearms in or around their homes unlocked and loaded.

D.C.'s low numbers are attributed to its long-standing bans on handguns and semiautomatic weapons.

The report finds overall 1.7 million U.S. children live in homes that have loaded and unlocked guns.

(Copyright 2005 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: banglist; dc; notenough
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: coloradan

Over there, even the SUVs shoot.


41 posted on 09/06/2005 1:22:55 PM PDT by varyouga (Reformed Kerry voter (I know, I'm a frickin' idiot))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

"A locked gun is a safe gun, loaded or not. An unloaded gun is just a bad truncheon."

A locked gun is as useless as a bad truncheon.


42 posted on 09/06/2005 1:29:19 PM PDT by School of Rational Thought (Republican - The thinking people's party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RobertP
Five percent of DC residents admit to being in criminal violation of the DC gun ban. Hmmm. That probably does tend to make a low number.
43 posted on 09/06/2005 1:30:41 PM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mushroom

May I direct you to:

More Guns - Less Crime
by John Lott


44 posted on 09/06/2005 1:31:04 PM PDT by El Laton Caliente (NRA Member & GUNSNET.NET Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RobertP
D.C.'s low numbers are attributed to its long-standing bans on handguns and semiautomatic weapons.

Reality check.

You have an handgun or assault rifle in DC, where it is illegal and will land you in the clink, quicker than Marion Barry can empty a crack pipe, and a pollster calls on the phone...

How would you answer?

I suspect there may be some politically correct dumbasses who would admit to having locked weapons which they didn't even possess, for the 'message' it would send.

45 posted on 09/06/2005 1:36:56 PM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

statisticly speaking, in regards to children and guns, children are defined as anyone under the age of 21, because you have to be 21 to buy a handgun. this includes gangbangers, emancipated children, felons, and JD's.
in regards to the 1.7million children, they worded it "children" because that number was much higher than "homes" (average home has more than one child).


46 posted on 09/06/2005 1:43:52 PM PDT by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

The number isn't zero, because DC's law has a sort of "grandfather cluse." If you registered your gun prior to a certain date (1978, I believe), you are allowed to keep it. Otherwise, you are out of luck. Of course, as time goes on, the relatively small number of "grandfathered" gun owners becomes less and less. It will eventually dwindle to zero; it's just not there yet.


47 posted on 09/06/2005 1:52:41 PM PDT by blau993 (Labs for love; .357 for Security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RobertP

Hmmm. My home has both!!


48 posted on 09/06/2005 1:53:41 PM PDT by Tatze (I voted for John Kerry before I voted against him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: School of Rational Thought

i dunno, my handgun safe under my bed is just big enough for my p220 and 4 mags. i'm sure if i swung it by the handle it would make a good club.
2 year old in the house means guns stay locked until she is old enough.


49 posted on 09/06/2005 1:54:02 PM PDT by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
statisticly speaking, in regards to children and guns, children are defined as anyone under the age of 21, because you have to be 21 to buy a handgun

It was a rhetorical question. The Bradys define children (in their skewed "stats") as 19 and under.

50 posted on 09/06/2005 1:56:21 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Puppage; absolootezer0

I'm thinking that the Brady bunch define children up to 23 years, 11 months and 29 days.


51 posted on 09/06/2005 1:58:30 PM PDT by B4Ranch (The New World Odor is UN-American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RobertP
Headline: 5 Percent of D.C. Homes Have Loaded or Unlocked Guns

A better and more accurate story would have begun with the headline:

25 Percent of D.C. Homes Have Loaded or Unlocked Crack Pipes

52 posted on 09/06/2005 2:03:58 PM PDT by Gritty ("Politics in America remains committed to a system of lavish funding of pseudo-action - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobertP
5 Percent of D.C. Homes Have Loaded or Unlocked Guns ^

Gotta try harder, until the fraction gets to around 30% to 50% , the goblins are willing to take the risk of a home invasion at times when people might be home. (Just guessing the numbers, but y'all get the point).

53 posted on 09/06/2005 2:47:10 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

Sawed off, sniper street sweeper. Sorry, forgot about those.


54 posted on 09/06/2005 2:56:13 PM PDT by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly
Last I heard, you were allowed to keep rifles in D.C., but not handguns.

From the NRA-ILA:

Rifles and Shotguns A person may buy or sell a firearm only from or to a licensed dealer in the District. Delivery cannot be made until the registration certificate for the firearm is approved by the Metropolitan Police Dept. Ammunition may be bought only for the caliber or gauge of a firearm registered to the buyer.

...

All firearms must be unloaded and disassembled or locked with a trigger lock except when kept at a registrant`s place of business or while being used for lawful "recreational" purposes. A D.C. license to carry a pistol is needed for one`s home or business and the pistol must also have been registered prior to September 24, 1976.

Self-defense in one`s home with a firearm is therefore legally precluded.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

They also indicate that in addition to the registration, which also functions as a permit to purchase, the prospective owner must be licensed.

55 posted on 09/06/2005 3:07:35 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RobertP

I don't know of anyone that lives in our area that does not have a hand gun, loaded or unloaded. I am also sure that 99.9% of everyone in our area also has a rifle and shotgun. We believe in the right to 'Keep and Bare Arms' for home protection and the hunting of tasty wildlife.


56 posted on 09/06/2005 3:09:30 PM PDT by Dustbunny (The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
Sawed-off?

I don't think Vermont would care, but the Federales, specifically the BATFErs, would be on you like white on rice.

57 posted on 09/06/2005 3:09:33 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Puppage

Anyone 17-19 years old. They are "children" when they commit their gang land crimes.


58 posted on 09/06/2005 3:11:28 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (The Imperial Federal Government is your worst enemy! Don't give in to them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
in DC, if you pay the fee, but no handguns and no rifles are allowed.

Not true, rifles are treated like shotguns. You can even have a handgun ... provided you registered it before Feb. 5, 1977. Otherwise, not. You can't carry it though, and can't even transport it, or a long gun, unless it's unloaded, and trigger locked or disassembled. You also have to have proof you are going to or coming from some "legitimate" recreation activity. The same applies to nonresident, in spite of the terms of the federal Firearm Owners Protectio Act of which provides:

Notwithstanding any state or local law, a person shall be entitled to transport a firearm from any place where he may lawfully possess it to any other place where he may lawfully possess such firearm if the firearm is unloaded and in the trunk. In vehicles without a trunk, the unloaded firearm shall be in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console.

59 posted on 09/06/2005 3:25:11 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
statisticly speaking, in regards to children and guns, children are defined as anyone under the age of 21, because you have to be 21 to buy a handgun.

And Audie Murphy, who earned, and was awarded, the Congressional Medal of Honor in WWII was how old when he enlisted in the United States Army? And our kids in 'Nam carrying 16's shooting the Cong? I'm fed up with the hypocrisy in the US government. Our neighbor's son is in the 82 Airborne. He's 20 years old and is one hell of a Patriotic American. The "Guns 'R Not Us" (Gun Control Inc) crowd really twist my shorts. I took my 16 year old son to a trap range and he hit 14/25 in his first round. A few years later, I gave him a lifetime membership to the NRA. We have several loaded pistols in our home. Everyone in the family knows where they are. All are trained in using these weapons.

What the Pelossi's, Clintons, Kennedys and Schumers of the world do not understand is RESPONSIBILITIES for one's actions. Ted, you've killed more people than my family in peacetime, has since I can go back 7 generations in our family. My Dad was a Commander in the USN 1942-1944, I'm certain he was responsible for his command killing the Japan es. As was my brother who was an evac chopper pilot in '70-'72.

Oh well. The planet/world mindset has changed, and continues to evolve as time presses on towards other possible precipices.

Cheers. Support our military. The rest of the Fed's programs can go to... a warm spot that is deep and rhymes with 'well'. IMOHO.

60 posted on 09/06/2005 4:47:46 PM PDT by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson