Aside from all the inane drivel that follows it I must admit to agreement with Pat Buchanan. He, is one of the few who have the courage to state the obvious. W, at every turn has, by HIS INACTION, failed to fulfill his obligation as Commander-in-Chief and President to secure our borders. He has done as the Prodigal President Clinton, before him did, prostituted his obligation for the sake of 'whoring' for prospective future votes. All this plus having called the sincere Minutemen "vigilantes" when all they tried to do was their collective patriotic duty to alert this Nation. For one who has set himself up as the champion of what is right, and whom I've consistently supported, despite some serious misgivings on policy decisions, he should be ashamed of himself.
To those who would criticize this view I ask...If we suffer another major terrorist incident and it can be traced to an infiltration via our wide open northern/southern land borders...On whose head do we hang the responsibility?
"Aside from all the inane drivel that follows it I must admit to agreement with Pat Buchanan. He, is one of the few who have the courage to state the obvious. W, at every turn has, by HIS INACTION, failed to fulfill his obligation as Commander-in-Chief and President to secure our borders..."
And we know that every president before him did. /sarc
Get real. It is not the President's job to enforce laws which already exist.
And, if we, God forbid, have another attack, and the perpetrators came through our southern or northern borders, and, they are here legally, like most on 9-11, then should Buchanan be arrested? You, like many libs, want retaliation for Clinton!
Another Impeach Bush fool heard from.
The terrorist. Nothing else, whatsoever, excuses the terrorist from 100% responsibility for his own actions.