Posted on 09/03/2005 6:39:25 AM PDT by ChadGore
In this short video (Real Media 34k stream). . at the very begining . . the 2nd sceen, shows yet another dozen unused blanco buses!
The print story is here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4210646.stm
Under the first image is a link that says "VIDEO Aid Finally arrives".
The URI for the RV Video is here:
Are you serious? He didn't really say that, did he?
I agree. There is no avoiding it when they begin so soon to try to place blame elsewhere for their own failures.
ping
I agree . . we all have an obligation to set the record straight. Liberal lies don't fly for a reason. They're arguments are not bolstered by the facts on the ground.
Let's be honest. They're pissed about the 4.9% unemployment rate, and are looking for anything to distract from this good news.
Someone really needs to check my math, but running 224 vehicles, carrying approx. 60 people, 100 miles outside the city at 50 mph (round trip 200 miles, round trip time 4 hours) would take about 29-30 hours to move 100,000 people.
this does assume running the vehicles 24 hours/day, does not include load/unload time nor the time required to refuel the vehicles
Thank for the bump :)
Absolutely disgusting waste of public resources....idiots.
bump
That is what was reported, days ago. Facts that are unimportant now since it's all the President's fault.
There is also the city buses, cabs, trains and other mass transit that could have been used...but those buses are only to be used to turn out the DUmocRAT voters on election day.
I agreed . . it's all about neglance.
Exactly, the political landscape in this country could be adversely be affected for years if we don't defend President Bush in this matter. The Rats tried to tarnish Reagan's legacy with Iran-Contra, thankfully they didn't get away with it.
It's all about negligence.
Let's be clear. More people could and should have been moved out of harms way. That much is obvious.
Thank you very much.
They didn't get away with it because, at the time, there where people like those on this thread, that are willing to tell the truth, no matter how ignorant the argument being presented is.
It's easy for us to say "well, this lib is so far gone, why make an argument?" That's the easy way out, but it doesn't help the truth to be told.
Not necessarily. The buses in the "215" picture are all front engine buses, probably in-line 6 cyl. engines. Unless the picture was taken before the water level reached its peak, the ignition components, air intakes, and fuel fillers of those buses are high and dry. Now, whether they would have to be driven through much deeper water to get to where they were needed is unknown, and there's no way to know how much fuel is in their tanks. But, as it appears in this picture, a vast majority of those buses are probably operational.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.