Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LOUISIANA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD - what did Gov. Blanco do and not do?
globalsecurity.org ^ | 2005

Posted on 09/02/2005 11:05:34 PM PDT by doug from upland

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-173 next last
To: doug from upland

Blanco was probably not elected by the voters in LA because she was effective at getting things done quickly. The people of LA who voted for her just got delivery on the conseqences of their voting, and so did the rest of the citizens living there.


121 posted on 09/03/2005 5:16:23 AM PDT by Modok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

The United States has become an entitlement state and we’re beginning to notice a lot of tears and cries that the Federal Government hasn’t done enough for the City of New Orleans during this catastrophe. In the end President Bush will take much of the blame and he probably deserves it for not doing enough to discourage the entitlement mentality we see in our Nation today.

What I’d liked to know…
What was the City of New Orleans Plan to evacuate the City in the case of a category 4 hurricane?

Who was responsible for creating and executing that plan? What went wrong in carrying out the plan?

Most importantly, why have we not seen the elected local officials taking control and giving encouragement on the ground in New Orleans during this emergency?

Did their entitlements run out on the winds of Katrina?


122 posted on 09/03/2005 5:21:46 AM PDT by Fearless Flyers (Proud to be of The Brave and the Free, http://fearless-flyers.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: barb-tex

Like LBJ I guess, spent his entire life with his nose stuck in the public trough.

Also bubba & jfKerry and a whole bunch more on both sides of the aisle. Something I always look at when deciding on how to vote for a chief executive (especially) is 'what else have you done?'

123 posted on 09/03/2005 5:45:49 AM PDT by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

She shook the farts out hospital blankets.


124 posted on 09/03/2005 5:49:24 AM PDT by angcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: IronMan04
I've never been down to your area. I realize the port & other features of the city are important for the country. I don't think this is any time to quibble, but...

Some communities never rebuilt after the 1993 flood. The feds prevented it for some of them, as the lesson from that flood was about rebuilding some of the natural floodplain, lost between the 1930's & the summer of 1993. Nine states were affected & the feds kicked in a *share* of what was lost.

http://www.e11th-hour.org/resources/timelines/floods.1993.html

For the record, my community wasn't flooded. My family took a trip via train through some of the affected areas that summer. We passed miles & miles of lakes, which had been farmer's planted fields before the rains came & stayed too long. It was kinda eerie to see the guys shoveling gravel under the tracks as we passed them. I think we were the first train to cross the Mississippi where we did, after the major flooding had stopped. You could tell by the waterline on the buildings in the area, the tracks had recently been underwater.

If the feds recommend relocating most of the residential units of NO elsewhere, what do you think should be the appropriate response? What do you think the response will be?
125 posted on 09/03/2005 5:49:28 AM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly

They need to rebuild the city and condemn land on the West Bank of the River to create a Spillway to Relieve the Mississippi. The Lake Side will be a bit more difficult. Perhaps build a canal and locks between the two bodies of water where you could relieve the lake into the river.


126 posted on 09/03/2005 5:55:36 AM PDT by IronMan04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: barb-tex
Attn MSM Bush, (not President Bush) acted illegily again!!! I know the 4th ID went there as I saw the convoy as it came down IH-10

Convoy of what? The PCA only says federal troops can't be used for law enforcement - not relief work.

"Posse Comitatus act generally prohibits U.S. military personnel from direct participation in law enforcement activities. Some of those law enforcement activities would include interdicting vehicles, vessels, and aircraft; conducting surveillance, searches, pursuit and seizures; or making arrests on behalf of civilian law enforcement authorities."

127 posted on 09/03/2005 6:13:42 AM PDT by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: JLS

bttt


128 posted on 09/03/2005 6:15:35 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
Good read on FEMA and the role that it plays.

It's amazing what a few facts can do to alter opinions IF someone is willing to listen and think.

Obviously the MSM is not included in that group.

129 posted on 09/03/2005 6:24:51 AM PDT by evad ( PC KILLS..and so do liberal judges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Damned if you don't, damned if you do. People were going to die no matter what. And President Bush was going to get the blame no matter what. As Hopper said in "Bug's Life", The first rule of leadership is "Everything is your fault."


130 posted on 09/03/2005 6:29:26 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Modok

You articulated perfectly that which I was thinking.


131 posted on 09/03/2005 6:34:06 AM PDT by verity (Don't let your children grow up to be mainstream media maggots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: hoboken109

The mayor too. They are democrat lead and it is nothing but chaos there.


132 posted on 09/03/2005 6:36:05 AM PDT by television is just wrong (http://hehttp://print.google.com/print/doc?articleidisblogs.blogspot.com/ (visit blogs, visit ads).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
This seems to be the thread to visit for substantive information.

Thank you all.

133 posted on 09/03/2005 6:38:43 AM PDT by verity (Don't let your children grow up to be mainstream media maggots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
She furthermore announced in her news conference Friday night that she was immediately forming a new state based Louisiana Disaster Recovery Foundation and requesting that contributions be sent there for the relief effort (Send the money to HER new foundation instead of the Red Cross????)

OMG! Oil for Food Louisiana style.

134 posted on 09/03/2005 6:47:30 AM PDT by Sal (Total failure Gov. Blankout now wants to cash in...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Louisiana Gov Kathleen B. Blanco controls both the Louisiana National Guard and the state Homeland Security Department. Through both entities she is keeping the Red Cross out of this desperate city.

During Shep's melt down yesterday he said he had never seen even one Red Cross vehicle or person the whole time he was there.

I'm not a big RC fan, prefer Salvation Army, but it looks like this one wasn't their fault. It was Blankout's fault.

135 posted on 09/03/2005 6:51:21 AM PDT by Sal (Total failure Gov. Blankout now wants to cash in...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: rineaux; ArmyTeach; konaice
A thousand pardons and a camel for your forgiveness.

One hump, or two?

136 posted on 09/03/2005 7:00:28 AM PDT by tarheelswamprat (This tagline space for rent - cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: arjay
I do not believe it was her motive, but, if she had called the NG in early and the federal gov't had been able to act sooner, Bush would have gotten credit for fast action and rescuing many more people.

Yeah, now imagine if he'd declared the state government unable to handle the emergency (legally required if he wants to send in Federal troops without being asked by the Governor) and just took over. That could have been the lever the Rats have been looking for that could get him impeached.

Like you, I don't think that was Blankout's motive--I think she's just plain incompetent to manage a small store let alone a state. But there is that nagging little suspicion that this could have been looked on as an opportunity.

137 posted on 09/03/2005 7:09:53 AM PDT by Sal (Total failure Gov. Blankout now wants to cash in...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: de Buillion

Oh! Thanks! That is a typo. I have just noticed lately I have a tendency to drop the last letter of a word when I write or type. I appreciate you taking time and bringing the error to my attention. Again thank you.


138 posted on 09/03/2005 7:19:25 AM PDT by Chgogal (Congressmen who willfully...during war...damage morale...should be arrested, exiled or..." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
The Feds cannot give orders to the National Guard unless they're called up to active duty.

The Governor has the main responsibility. She dropped the ball by not declaring an emergency and requesting before the storm hit that the Pentagon authorize the sending of ARNG and ANG troops -- as well as requesting that governors of other states send troops.

Several states were ready, willing and able to send troops -- but Blanco failed to ask for them. The one governor who really had his stuff together was the governor of Wisconsin. He declared an emergency outside his own state(!) and had the troops utterly ready to go.

Blanco and Nagin are certainly not Rudy G!

139 posted on 09/03/2005 7:22:54 AM PDT by AlaninSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: IronMan04

I'm sure you know the logistics of the situation a lot better than I. However, as long as the city's infrastructure is built below sea level, there will always be the potential for big problems.

Rebuilding a mass quantity of low income housing in a concentrated area does not make any kind of sense to me. Yes, poor people need places to live, but NO does not need to build a new Cabrini Green, which is something I fear will happen if/when you rebuild housing in the city again. Building the city for the same size population on less land almost makes that more likely. No?


140 posted on 09/03/2005 7:34:06 AM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson