To: Alberta's Child
3. From a political standpoint, I don't think anyone who looks at the situation objectively would even want to see New Orleans rebuilt. This is mainly because from this point forward it could only function as a massive public works project that turns into a city in which the government owns 100% of the land. Just think about this for a moment . . . the most far-reaching implication of this disaster is that land titles in a city below sea level are basically worthless. This means that no prudent investor will ever buy a piece of property, no bank will ever extend a mortgage without extensive government guarantees, and no insurance companies would underwrite a property/casualty policy in a rebuilt New Orleans. What about building homes on stilts, as is done in other hurricane-prone areas?
2,228 posted on
09/01/2005 9:56:42 PM PDT by
supercat
(Don't fix blame--FIX THE PROBLEM.)
To: supercat
What about building homes on stilts, as is done in other hurricane-prone areas? Most of these are vacation homes (even if they are very expensive ones) in areas where there is no real expectation for big-city amenities. I couldn't imagine a scenario in which it would make any practical sense to build an entire city of more than a million people in this manner.
3,085 posted on
09/02/2005 5:59:32 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
(I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
To: supercat
Here are before and after pictures of the Atlantic House restaurant, on Folly Beach, SC. It was built on stilts too.
![](http://www.geocities.com/hurricanene/hugo3.jpg)
![](http://www.geocities.com/hurricanene/hugo4.jpg)
3,251 posted on
09/02/2005 6:46:28 AM PDT by
Doohickey
(If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice...I will choose freewill.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson