Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro

It amazes me that the only response to an effort to deal with the evidence is to throw rocks. Because Dr Sarfati's work doesn't support the evolution model, it is by definition wrong?


61 posted on 08/31/2005 7:44:37 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (The radical secularization of America is happening)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: LiteKeeper

You might be interested to know that Denton now accepts common descent, along with Behe and Dembski.


65 posted on 08/31/2005 7:47:06 PM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: LiteKeeper; VadeRetro
It amazes me that the only response to an effort to deal with the evidence is to throw rocks.

What amazes *me* is how you in particular, and creationists in general, are so consistently able to completely misunderstand simple English. VadeRetro's post was quite clear, and it demonstrated one of the fundamental flaws in Sarfati's so-called "argument". And yet, that somehow flew right over your head, and all you could manage to dimly grasp of it was the following bizarre conclusion:

Because Dr Sarfati's work doesn't support the evolution model, it is by definition wrong?

No... And I don't see how any thinking person could have arrived at such a strange reading of the material. Instead, it showed that Sarfati's "work" is quite simply wrong when compared to the actual evidence.

80 posted on 08/31/2005 8:16:29 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson