It amazes me that the only response to an effort to deal with the evidence is to throw rocks. Because Dr Sarfati's work doesn't support the evolution model, it is by definition wrong?
You might be interested to know that Denton now accepts common descent, along with Behe and Dembski.
What amazes *me* is how you in particular, and creationists in general, are so consistently able to completely misunderstand simple English. VadeRetro's post was quite clear, and it demonstrated one of the fundamental flaws in Sarfati's so-called "argument". And yet, that somehow flew right over your head, and all you could manage to dimly grasp of it was the following bizarre conclusion:
Because Dr Sarfati's work doesn't support the evolution model, it is by definition wrong?
No... And I don't see how any thinking person could have arrived at such a strange reading of the material. Instead, it showed that Sarfati's "work" is quite simply wrong when compared to the actual evidence.