Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Woodstock; Dog Gone
"hubby is a ChemE in this industry, spcifically, hazardous clean-up for these types of facilities, and I can actually say everyone should be VERY concerned at that picture."

I don't see any problems in that pic. The water in the flooded tank farms is contained in the retention ponds that are designed to contain any product leak from the tanks. There's no sign whatsoever of leaks. ie.irridescent sheens.

The facility itself was shutdown and prepared for the storm beforehand. That equipment is quite able to handle the storm. Note the tanks are full and appear untouched also.

As far as I know, Chevron has not reported that this refinery has incurred significant damage.

5,916 posted on 09/01/2005 3:17:42 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5745 | View Replies ]


To: All

so i will rely on tv no update


5,918 posted on 09/01/2005 3:18:30 PM PDT by jhny7 (made in USA tested in japan mess with USA we'll use it again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5916 | View Replies ]

To: spunkets
I don't see any problems in that pic. The water in the flooded tank farms is contained in the retention ponds that are designed to contain any product leak from the tanks. There's no sign whatsoever of leaks. ie.irridescent sheens.

Agree, no integrety issue to be seen. Time will tell. These farms are not as impermeable as we might think and I can only guess that there will be ground water issues later, should ground water be a concern in a city below sea level.

5,925 posted on 09/01/2005 3:22:22 PM PDT by Woodstock (Unionize China)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5916 | View Replies ]

To: spunkets

I'd concur with that. There may be some damage to the refinery from the winds, although nothing seems damaged in that photo, but the water wasn't a problem.


5,957 posted on 09/01/2005 3:29:36 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5916 | View Replies ]

To: spunkets

I agree. I don't see any obvious signs of leaks. There is no sheen on the waters in the pic and the water appears to be contained within several dikes (concrete, then earthen). The concrete would've been coated with an impermeable top coat, we 'painted' our containments areas once a year to meet EPA permit requirements. Unless the tanks suffer from wind damage or wind stress, they should function as designed. Even the complete failure of one tank appears it would be contained.


5,973 posted on 09/01/2005 3:33:03 PM PDT by EBH (Never give-up, Never give-in, and Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5916 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson