Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will base closings sap support for military?
Christian Science Monitor ^ | 26 August 2005 | Mark Sappenfield and Sara Miller

Posted on 08/28/2005 9:12:59 PM PDT by BitDrifter

WASHINGTON and BRUNSWICK, Maine — Almost as far back as Don Russell can recall, planes from the nearby naval air station have roared overhead, an audible assurance of security, especially since the Sept. 11 attacks.

<-- SNIP -->

Some wonder whether the military, by leaving so many places where it has long been a part of the community, is setting itself up to become too remote from the very people it is charged with protecting. This changes the calculus on everything from defense budgets to recruiting and retention.

(Excerpt) Read more at csmonitor.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: baseclosings; brac; military; recruitment
I beleive the premise of the article has merit.
1 posted on 08/28/2005 9:13:00 PM PDT by BitDrifter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BitDrifter

It won't sap any support from the military. What it will sap is support of the government tit that people have gotten used to suckling on. It's the cold hard truth. If anyone gets mad at the military for moving out, they didn't have real support for the military in the first place.


2 posted on 08/28/2005 9:23:59 PM PDT by vpintheak (Liberal = The antithesis of Freedom and Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak

I think what the article was trying to suggest was that if people are not exposed to the Military, that recruitment could drop.

People have a tendancy to do things that people around them do or do things that they are exposed to regularly. If there is an occupation that is dominant in a town, others tend to follow suit.


3 posted on 08/28/2005 9:30:37 PM PDT by BitDrifter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak
Regardless of the "merit" of the article, NAS Brunswick is a loser. The P-3's primary role as an ASW platform has long since outlived its key function in the North Atlantic.What ocean surveillance is tasked by CincLant in that area Atlantic could very well be handled from PAX.

The Russians can't even keep their subs afloat; and the Chinese are operating in a different piece of real estate.

In the old days, the Lobster Runs to Brunswick from Norfolk and Jax were legendary; but then again, that was when lobster was running well under a dollar/pound.

Not worth the trip now. (30 year later) *S*

So, I say, close it! And, put a stick in Snowe's eye at the same time. Too bad Chaffee has not relocated a bit further north. We could nail him as well. **S**
4 posted on 08/28/2005 11:09:22 PM PDT by dk/coro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dk/coro

Sure , closing the military bases will sap our strength, but this is what is intended. The closing of bases, the reduction of military airplanes and ships etc, is all written up in the US Treaty for Disarmament, preparing us to enter in to the One World Government. Go read it.


5 posted on 08/28/2005 11:21:55 PM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
Sure , closing the military bases will sap our strength, but this is what is intended. The closing of bases, the reduction of military airplanes and ships etc, is all written up in the US Treaty for Disarmament, preparing us to enter in to the One World Government. Go read it.

Listen, I like a good conspiracy as much as the next fella, but I think you are wrong in this case.

From what I have seen, the BRAC commission did a pretty good job of consolidatng like functions (creating a fires center that consolidates air defense and field artillery training and doctrine, consolidating maneuver functions, consolidating logistical and quartermaster functions) without losing capability.

Fort Monroe is slated to close; it has become strictly an admin post, as it has no maneuver or training facilities, and contains only admin and headquarters functions anyway; it is better suited as a national park. But the functions were not eliminated, merely moved, and most of them were moved to Fort Eustis, which is a mere twenty miles away. A solid recommendation.

6 posted on 08/29/2005 1:37:56 AM PDT by DeeOhGee (Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BitDrifter

The local Brunswick rag, the Times Record, is so left wing it drowns out the sound of the P3s. Hold a rally with 200 people supporting the war and nothing in the paper. Hold one with 3 opposed and front page news.

BTW. The anti-war group can be counted on to protest everything that was protested back in the 60s. They look like the hippy branch of the AARP.


7 posted on 08/29/2005 3:59:41 AM PDT by KeyWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitDrifter
Agreed. This is a serious concern that is only being accentuated in a large number of other fields...as we depend on fewer and fewer specialists to take care of business, so to speak, from the military, and its essential political base of support, to science, and industry, where policy makers and a good chunk of the public show no comprehension of the essentials to amintain competitiveness... We are losing "connection" as a society to what it takes.

The right stuff is being phased as out as duplicative. Pretty soon, there won't be any more large groups of people with the right stuff.

8 posted on 08/29/2005 9:10:51 AM PDT by Paul Ross (Definition of strict constructionist: someone who DOESN'T hallucinate when reading the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson