Posted on 08/25/2005 3:29:09 PM PDT by NZerFromHK
Edited on 08/25/2005 3:34:26 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Well I could crack a really good raunchy joke about Communists and gay habits...but I will leave it to your imagination. :-)
So the courts make a judgment on this behavior based upon what?
I guess the American left called in some favors?
Interesting enough, there is an editorial on a Chinese-language newspaper published by the same group that produced this news story. It says "A civilized society must guarantee the interests of minosity and avoid tyranny of a majority, but it should also guarantee religious freedom...provided a protection clause to the persecuted could potentially morph into a weapon in which the persecuted use to attack others. In that case we will have 'tyranny of a minority'. In the legislating process the government [of Hong Kong] need not move in haste to win approvals from the West. Different societies each have their own unique social conditions and environments, and the government should legislate accordingly considering the local conditions and balance interests of different sections of society to ensure that tolerance in Hong Kong society will not be damaged."
http://hk.news.yahoo.com/050824/60/1fxag.html
In other words, what this dribbler wants to imply is that: "we are pro-family here in Hong Kong, but since the West is a different society so I think their pro-life movements should not be supported. The West has a different culture and I think gay rights should triumph there!"
Pathetic, on the part of HK newspapers.
From now on, be careful when ordering a pu pu platter...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.