Posted on 08/24/2005 5:44:07 AM PDT by dukeman
When 15-year-old Chelsea Rhoades left for school early one day last December, her family expected it to be just another normal, uneventful day at one of Indianas premier public high schools. But school officials had slightly different plans.
When Chelsea arrived in her school homeroom that day, her teacher directed everyone who did not have an opt-out slip to another classroom. Only five students had slips. The rest, who had no idea what the teacher was talking about, were divided into groups of 10-15, herded into classrooms and placed in front of computers. Chelsea, who was busy helping a friend in a wheelchair get situated in front of a computer, barely registered what she was signing when a form was placed in front of her. No explanations were issued. At least, none that Chelsea can recall. All she knew was that she was about to take a test. What she didnt know was that the test, made up of yes-and-no questions with no room for alternate answers or explanations, is part of a TeenScreen mental health screening program for suicide and social disorders that is being implemented in schools across the country, often without parental knowledge or consent.
After completing the test, which took 10 minutes, the students were instructed to wait outside. Thats where an employee with the local community mental health center found Chelsea, directed her to a more private hallway and then informed her that, according to her test results, she was suffering from OCD (obsessive compulsive disorder) and social anxiety. The mental health worker explained that the test results indicated Chelsea had OCD because she responded that she liked to help clean the house and social anxiety disorder because she responded that she didnt party much. The worker told her that if her condition got any worse, her mom should bring her to the mental health center for treatment.
According to Chelsea, all her friends were told that something was wrong with them, too. In fact, it seemed that the only students who werent told they were suffering from some sort of so-called disorder were the ones with the opt-out slips. And when Chelseas mom heard about the events of the day and her daughters diagnosis of OCD and social disorder, she immediately took action.
Driven by recommendations from President Bushs New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, which has called for mental health screening for all school-aged children, including those in preschool, TeenScreen is sweeping across the nation and finding its way into our public schools. Some states have already moved forward to implement recommendations by the commission. For example, the Illinois legislature has passed a plan to screen the mental health of all pregnant women and children up to 18 years of age. The plan also includes the use of antidepressant drugs. Under such a plan, both children and adults will be screened for so-called mental illness during their routine physical exams.
This all began in April 2002 when President Bush launched a new mental health commission. After supposedly conducting a comprehensive study, the commission recommended mental health screening for consumers of all ages, including preschool children. Schools, the commission concluded, are in a key position to screen the 52 million students and 6 million adults who work in the public schools.
So whats the problem with that? For one, although these programs are touted as suicide prevention tools, they seem to have more to do with drugging children than saving livesand they are understandably raising an outcry among parents and child advocacy groups alike. For example, the Alliance for Human Research Protection (www.ahrp.org) speaks about this screening program in terms of its being a duo-drug promotion scam and declaring otherwise normal children to be mentally ill. And Phyllis Schlafly (www.eagleforum.org) points out that drug companies are gearing up for bigger sales of antidepressants at the same time that the FDA is requiring warnings that antidepressants increase the risk of suicidal thinking and behavior in children who take them.
Chelseas parents have done a great deal to sound the alarm in their community about this insidious program. They used part of the family budget to place a large advertisement in their local paper in an effort to inform other parents about troubling aspects of the mental health screening program that include possible referrals of students for treatment, which could include drugs; entirely subjective diagnoses of psychological problems; and lack of evidence that screening for suicide risk reduces suicide attempts. And with the help of The Rutherford Institute, they are also preparing to file a lawsuit against the school district for its failure to inform them about the test or gain their permission.
It has been well established that parents have a fundamental constitutional right over the care, custody and control of their children, absent some showing of abuse or neglect. So for those who want to protect their families from this latest assault on the family, there are some immediate steps that can be taken to combat the problem.
First, learn your rights as a parent under the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment. The PPRA is a federal law that was intended to protect the rights of parents and students. The PPRA allows parents to inspect their childrens instructional materials and requires that schools obtain written parental consent before schools engage in such programs as mental health screening. Also, contact your local school officials and demand that you be notified immediately if they are conducting mental health screening on your children. Finally, contact your representatives in Congress and protest these invasive activities that are being foisted on unsuspecting students and families.
For Chelsea and her family, the battle is just beginning. But if they are able to prevail, hopefully the Indiana school district, as well as other schools, will develop a little social anxiety of their own.
Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute and author of the award-winning Grasping for the Wind. He can be contacted at johnw@rutherford.org.
The meatloaf thing is a bit disturbing.
Do you put ketchup or mustard on the sandwiches? And what about cheese?
with mustard! :-)
I like meatloaf. Am I wierd or what??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?..............
They are teaching our children to be professional victims. They can blame everything they do on their particular 'disorder'.
It sounds terminal for sure. I give you the rest of your life to live and not a day longer. My bill is in the mail.
Dr. Conspiracy Guy MDPCACDDCCNA
Maybe you're weird.
(What's the disorder for Spelling Cops?)
Ok then... you're merely eccentric. :)
The Hatch Amendment requires not merely the lack of an "opt out", but positive parental consent before anything that can be considered psychological treatment, conditioning, or testing can be performed. It also applies to stuff like DARE and "diversity training".
-Eric
The problem I have with this article is that it was written by the Rutherford Institute, which typically means that there's more to the story. Probably true in this case, too.
GENERAL
Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA)
The Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA) (20 U.S.C. § 1232h; 34 CFR Part 98) applies to programs that receive funding from the U.S. Department of Education (ED). PPRA is intended to protect the rights of parents and students in two ways:
It seeks to ensure that schools and contractors make instructional materials available for inspection by parents if those materials will be used in connection with an ED-funded survey, analysis, or evaluation in which their children participate; and
It seeks to ensure that schools and contractors obtain written parental consent before minor students are required to participate in any ED-funded survey, analysis, or evaluation that reveals information concerning:
- Political affiliations;
- Mental and psychological problems potentially embarrassing to the student and his/her family;
- Sex behavior and attitudes;
- Illegal, anti-social, self-incriminating and demeaning behavior;
- Critical appraisals of other individuals with whom respondents have close family relationships;
- Legally recognized privileged or analogous relationships, such as those of lawyers, physicians, and ministers; or
- Income (other than that required by law to determine eligibility for participation in a program or for receiving financial assistance under such program).
- Parents or students who believe their rights under PPRA may have been violated may file a complaint with ED by writing the Family Policy Compliance Office. Complaints must contain specific allegations of fact giving reasonable cause to believe that a violation of PPRA occurred.
For additional information or technical assistance, you may call (202) 260-3887 (voice). Individuals who use TDD may call the Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339. Or you may contact us at the following address:
Family Policy Compliance Office
U.S. Department of Education
400 Maryland Avenue, SW
Washington, D.C. 20202-5920
She didn't party much......uhmnnn. That is prime suspect. And Chelsea wanted to clean house! Sounds to me she would have been better off taught at home.
That means you are a sicko. You are probably pro-life, too.
Anyway, this was not the best story to read on a day when my homeschooled son just headed off for his first day at a public high school.
Good luck!
Besides, you got a problem with OCD? We got rights.
For what?..re-education? Nurse Ratchet will greet you at the door and give you a little red book.
Thanks, it was a very hard decision.
His two sisters are still homeschooled.
What a fine way to spend our money. What a fine way to indoctrinate, and disable our childrens abiltity to fend for themselves. /s
OK, repeat after me, "Bush is good, Bush is good". Bush really isn't a conservative, in my book! He talks good, but he doesn't act like it...
Bigger Gum't than libs
Bigger Spending than libs
More attacks on people's freedom, and liberty. This "screening" program is like poking a stick in our eyes. When the gum't controls your kids, you lose! The "gum't" doesn't have your best interests, in mind!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.