Posted on 08/24/2005 4:05:00 AM PDT by billorites
NEVER GET into a battle of wits with an unarmed man, goes an old saying. It's good advice, except when the unarmed man picks the fight — before an audience of millions. Then you're stuck. We found ourselves in that position on Monday.
Notorious rhetorical ruffian Bill O'Reilly of Fox News went on both his radio show and his television show on Monday and mischaracterized the editorial position of this newspaper — even after he was informed three times of our real position.
O'Reilly expressed outrage that we editorialized on Aug. 17 in favor of Gov. John Lynch's decision to study Florida's Jessica Lunsford Act. He and a paid commentator on his TV show characterized the editorial as opposing the Florida law and tougher punishments for child rapists. The editorial did neither.
Our position on the Lunsford Act was perfectly clear. It is, simply, that the attorney general should study it before anyone decides that this specific law is the one New Hampshire should adopt. O'Reilly took that position and twisted it into something wholly unrecognizable, as a baboon would demolish a lump of Play-Doh.
His and his legal expert Wendy Murphy's suggestions that we oppose getting tough on child rapists, after we told O'Reilly's staff multiple times that we were concerned the Lunsford Act might be too lenient on them, is incomprehensible and in no way supported by the editorial or the statements we gave him after he began his Cro-Magnon ravings.
Most curiously, O'Reilly apparently began reading from our statement on the air, then stopped after two words. Instead of reading our statement or the original editorial, he just called us cowards. Nice. Way to face the facts and engage in an honest debate, there, Bill.
O'Reilly has not responded to our attempts to correct the misstatements. Must be a coward.
O'Reilly is trumpeting the Lunsford Act as the only possible way to get tough on sexual predators who prey on children, which of course is nonsense. He loves to mention the act's mandatory 25-year minimum sentence for anyone convicted of child rape. While we are all for mandatory minimums for sexually abusing a child (which O'Reilly knows), the Lunsford Act, at more than 80 pages long, contains a lot more than those mandatory minimums. O'Reilly's simplistic attempt to portray us as against tough punishments for sex offenders just because we want to see everything that is in the bill is childish and contemptible. But then, one could say the same of Bill O'Reilly himself
Zing!
Blue Meanie mealy-mouthed O'Reily bashers at it again!
Are you going to take any legal action against O'Reilly?
Amen.
I'll bet they just love the US tax code though.
Too bad you were to chicken sheet to come on his show and explain your position in person.
Bill stated their position properly, that is why they are so pissed and now backtracking.
The Leprechaun is a pathetic ass.
I agree that stats shouldn't just blindly follow each other. What's good for Florida may not be good for Michigan. It seems everytime some one is missing, it's Florida or California. I realize one child is too many but what is in this deal? After seeing Rita Crosby last night, she had a couple on who had sex with a 16 yr old. Hey 16 is the age of consent in most states, but yes he was a teacher.
-Eric
Paid commentator? What's up with that?
O'Reilly is looking after children and that is a good thing. He invited a representative of the newspaper to come on and defend their position, and they backed down. That is not a good thing.
O'reilly is a pompous self-obsessed a$$. His ego is the biggest thing about him and he is wrong as often as he is correct.
The other thing I hate about him is that he talks tough but when he has a liberal celebrity on he very rarely takes them on. He usually kowtows to them.
O'Reilly is only good as a foil for DUs to attack.
And, therein lies the elephant in the livingroom, IMHO.
How about an example of a false story that was aired, hmm?
Hoow about this story here where he said the Union Leader was against this bill?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.