Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Governor snuffs out smoking in dorms
North Jersey Newspapers ^ | 08.23.05 | REBECCA SANTANA

Posted on 08/23/2005 7:20:18 PM PDT by Coleus

Governor snuffs out smoking in dorms

PRINCETON - Saying it would reduce the risk of fires and protect students' health, acting Governor Codey signed legislation Monday banning smoking in dormitories at public and private colleges.

"Today we are creating safer, healthier residence halls," Codey said in a written statement. The governor signed the legislation at Drew University in Madison where a cigarette ignited a dorm room fire on Feb. 14. Automatic sprinklers quickly doused the fire and no one was injured.

The ban will go into effect in 60 days, and individual colleges will decide how to enforce it.

According to a 2001 study by the Harvard School of Public Health, 27 percent of colleges prohibit smoking in student dormitories, and the study's author, Henry Wechsler, said the number has gone up since then.

Wechsler praised the New Jersey ban. While it might not encourage serious smokers to quit, his research has shown that such bans may keep many students from starting in the first place, Wechsler said.

"We found that students who do not smoke before college and go into non-smoking dorms are less likely to take up smoking," said Wechsler.

It is unclear how many students will actually be affected by the legislation, since many colleges and universities in the Garden State already have dormitory smoking bans in place.

Jason Butkowski, spokesman for the Senate Democrats, said all public institutions banned smoking in dormitories after a fire at Seton Hall University in January 2000 killed three students. Although the Seton Hall fire was not blamed on careless smoking, it prompted additional safety measures, including a law requiring sprinkler systems in college dorm rooms.

Among New Jersey's private universities, Seton Hall, Princeton and Rider already have banned smoking in dorm rooms or were planning to before the governor signed the legislation.

Princeton's ban on smoking in undergraduate dormitories will go into effect when students come back from vacation this fall.

Starting this fall, about 2,225 students who live on-campus at Rider University in Lawrenceville will not be able to smoke in their rooms, either.

According to Anthony Campbell, associate vice president for student affairs, the ban came about after a survey of the school's students showed that more than 60 percent wanted smoke-free dorms.


TOPICS: US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: codey; dorms; newjersey; nj; pufflist

1 posted on 08/23/2005 7:20:19 PM PDT by Coleus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Coleus

How can he make this law apply to private institutions?


2 posted on 08/23/2005 7:23:40 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

And New Jersey is a cesspool of politicial corruption, but By God, no smoking in the dorms!!!


3 posted on 08/23/2005 7:24:37 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

One incident,no injuries. Not overacting a little is he? What part of private does he not understand? What's next? Homes? Hotels?


4 posted on 08/23/2005 7:24:48 PM PDT by CindyDawg ( FreeRepublic.." Sight" of the free and supporters of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

What If 60% wanted real professors instead of commies, would he ban them?


5 posted on 08/23/2005 7:30:03 PM PDT by 359Henrie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

NJ was the first (?) state to limit toilet flushes to 1.5 gallons in the early 90's before the technology was there and congress followed suit. Democrats love to pass laws which infringe on people's rights and privacy. After the Seton hall u. dorm fire where 3 students died, the republican legislature mandated sprinklers in all the college dorms, public and private. I know it's for the children.


6 posted on 08/23/2005 7:30:15 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Huh? What about use of illegal drugs in dorms? What about underage drinking of alcohol in dorms? What about promiscious sex in dorms? What about hazing? I guess, according to all of you anti-smoking Nazis, all that is OK as long as the students don't smoke a cigarette (joints are OK then, huh)??????


7 posted on 08/23/2005 7:32:19 PM PDT by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
What part of private does he not understand? What's next? Homes? Hotels?

The dorm houses a great many people, but unlike a rental property; the dorm room is not 'private'. Lord knows many college students wish it were. For example, the dorm may 'close' for holidays; so students have to find somewhere else to live during Christmas and New Years. Also, non-students can not live in the dorm (married student housing is the exception). Also, in a great many states, any/all alcohol is prohibited, as are guns, knives and over-night 'guests'.

Given that the property belongs to the state, the state gets to make the rules. I can not see where the Govenor would have ANY authority over private college dorms. However, I know I wouldn't want everything I own to reek of smoke, because my (assigned) roommate was a smoker.

8 posted on 08/23/2005 7:32:28 PM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, come Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

Yeah, I hear you but....
Smoke alarms and sprinklers were put in for these instances. They worked. You would think people would be happy about that. Why fix something that isn't broken? By the way, I don't smoke.


9 posted on 08/23/2005 7:38:29 PM PDT by CindyDawg ( FreeRepublic.." Sight" of the free and supporters of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Saying it would reduce the risk of fires and protect students' health..

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

In a further government-enforced health development Govenor Codey has banned the following: beer, pizza, Oreo's, salt, MSG, nitrites, and MONSTER THICKBURGERS.

10 posted on 08/23/2005 7:46:37 PM PDT by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

I don't think anyone should complain about this: at least smoking tobacco isn't a FEDERAL OFFENSE!

Yeah, I agree that this is a stupid law, & as a former nicotine addict I would be outraged if I still smoked cigarettes...but hey, it's still perfectly legal for adults to do.

I hope that some day those who smoke cigarettes will eventually come to understand what those of us who enjoy smoking marijuana are going through (regarding losing our jobs via piss testing, having our children taken away from us, being thrown in jail, having our property forfeited to the State, etc. etc.)


11 posted on 08/23/2005 7:54:05 PM PDT by libertyman (It's time to make marijuana legal AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg
Smoke alarms and sprinklers were put in for these instances.

No, smoke alarms and sprinklers were put in to the dorms to put out fires from any number of sources (cooking, TV, over-loaded outlets, pranks gone horribly awry, toasters used for pizza, stereo receivers in tight places, ect.).

Given the minority status of smokers among college students (at least in my case), there are not enough smokers to have a "smoker's only" dorm; and frankly speaking, most smokers hate smelly "Smoker's Only" rooms too. How often do you find a smoker requesting a 'non-smoking' hotel room; only to smoke in that room too? Chances are, that most smokers would prefer to live in a smoke-free room, given a choice. The problem lies in that the majority of students do not want their clothes, bedding, shoes and hair smelling like smoke.

Personally, I would have preferred to see the student body VOTE on this.

12 posted on 08/23/2005 7:57:40 PM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, come Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
I would have preferred to see the student body VOTE on this.

Hey, we found something we can agree on. That was all I was saying.

13 posted on 08/23/2005 8:00:50 PM PDT by CindyDawg ( FreeRepublic.." Sight" of the free and supporters of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

"According to Anthony Campbell, associate vice president for student affairs, the ban came about after a survey of the school's students showed that more than 60 percent wanted smoke-free dorms."

That's funny, more than 60% of Southerns wanted slavery.


14 posted on 08/23/2005 8:44:25 PM PDT by Bob J (RIGHTALK.com...a conservative alternative to NPR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Banning tobacco or doobies?


15 posted on 08/23/2005 9:39:09 PM PDT by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson