[RobRoy]

"And how would you feel about astrology being taught alongside astronomy?"

Most of what is taught in astronomy can be called science. Most of what is taught on evolution is not.

You are comparing apples and oranges. Evolution "theory" is unique in it's religious nature compared to the other sciences. That is because the others do not make wild unprovable claims and then call you a moron if you don't accept them.

[Physicist]

Most of what is taught in astronomy can be called science. Most of what is taught on evolution is not.

Scientists don't remotely share your assessment, and their assessment is what counts (or rather, what should count) in public policy.

[Vive ut Vivas]

Most of what is taught in astronomy can be called science. Most of what is taught on evolution is not.

I see no difference. I want to know why you accept the evidence in astronomy but not biology. I'm baffled.