[Vive ut Vivas]

Most of what is taught in astronomy can be called science. Most of what is taught on evolution is not.

I see no difference. I want to know why you accept the evidence in astronomy but not biology. I'm baffled.

[PatrickHenry]

I want to know why you accept the evidence in astronomy but not biology.

Because astronomy is reproducable in the lab!
</flaming creationist mode>

[RobRoy]

Most of what I "accept" in astronimy is verifiable, like the relationships of planets and stars.

The big bang theory, on the other hand... But at least it isn't religiously defended as so many of the subcategories of evolution studies are.

Astronomy is primarily science. Biology is primarily science. Evolution is primarily religion.