[NathanBookman]

Libs know Gorelick is one the verge of being busted big time and they are trying to spin that the wall did not affect DoD. B.S.

I can not believe she was allowed on the 9/11 commission. As someone else said, hey Jamie, it's not the cover-up, it's the crime, and her wall was a big crime!!!

[ovrtaxt]

Scruggs, by the way, was no mere bystander in this issue. He pressed for stricter constraints on information sharing in 1994, after the prosecution of Aldrich Ames for espionage. He complained about the supposedly loose interpretations of FISA at the FBI and in the intel communities, and on his own began imposing his own "wall" even without direction to do so from Reno or Gorelick. This action gets Scruggs his only mention in the Commission report (page 78).

Bastard. I wonder if that 2 star General that got in Schaeffer's face is a buddy of Scruggs?

[maestro]

?..... top attorney at Defense just as she did later at Justice. The second, and most obvious, is that as the number-two person at Justice, she still set policy for the FBI. Since sharing and cooperation require two parties to work together, her wall would have made any attempt to engage the FBI pointless....?

and,......how did Robert Hannessien of the FBI feel about this?

[Boazo]

[nairBResal]

bttt

[Fiddlstix]

BTTT

[Mo1]

It's bad enough that Gorelick erected that wall in 1995. It's ludicrous that four years after 9/11, people waste their time defending her and her participation in the 9/11 Commission as a panel member instead of a witness.

The libs can spin this for all they want

The bottom line is that Gorelick should NEVER have been on that panel

And she sure as heck should NEVER have been in the position to filter what the rest of the Commission was to or not to see

She should have been a witness

[GOPJ]

bump

[GOPJ]

ping

[Cautor]

Thanks for the post. Some good background here also and from the annals of FR itself: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1462440/posts

[tomahawk]

The blood of the 3,000+ is on her hands, as well as others'.

[wayoverontheright]

Drip, drip, drip.

Each new revelation brings us closer to the conclusion that the Clintons' actions while in office DELIBERATELY left our country exposed to attack. For most of us, this conclusion has been, up to now, incomprehensible.

Why would they do this?

It is now obvious that the Clintons never left the mindset of the sixties. For them capitalism still owed them nothing, and the "military industrial complex" was still the embodiment of the enemy, and had to be neutered.

Those who ascribe their actions while in office as "bumbling" or a series of inadvertent "snafus" fail to see the deliberate character of everything they did, and, in light of Hillary's possible ascension to the seat of power, casts an ominous shadow over our future as a people.

[mewzilla]

All roads lead back to Bubba...

Why did he refuse to act against UBL and AQ? Inquiring minds want to know.

[bmwcyle]

The wall was put up to prevent any NSA intercepts of the Clinton that Vince Foster could not remove on his trips to Fort Mead.

[adam_az]

Gorelick WORKED WITH Clark

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1118806/posts

I dug this up more than a year ago

[CyberAnt]

{{{ ping }}}

[Alia]

bookmark

[wouldntbprudent]

bttt

This woman needs to be busted, big-time.

[newzjunkey]

bttt

[Pagey]

bttt