Posted on 08/17/2005 6:00:32 AM PDT by epow
Defining women
IRAQ: Will the new constitution affirm democratic values or use democracy to impose Shariah? What it says about women will tell | by Jill Nelson
Zeena al-Qushtaini was a successful Iraqi businesswoman who owned a pharmacy in Baghdad. A divorced mother, she was known for her Western style of dress, refusing to don the traditional Islamic headscarf. But her progressive ways and involvement with women's activists led to her death. Last November, Zeena was kidnapped and murdered—her body found on a highway, clad in a black, full-length abaya and a blood-stained headscarf. A note attached to the abaya read, "She was a collaborator against Islam."
As the Iraqi National Assembly races toward an Aug. 15 deadline for completion of a constitution, many Iraqi women fear the future. A glance at numerous Muslim nations reveals how Islam can marginalize women, denying them basic rights and sometimes persecuting them. Article 1 of the latest leaked draft proposes, in translation, that "Islam is the official religion of the state and it is the main source of legislation and it [Parliament] is not allowed to make laws that contradict the fundamental teachings of Islam and its rules." That means Islamic law—notorious for making women second-class citizens—will play a role in domestic issues. The rights of Iraqi women will lie in the hands of 275 Parliament members who will attempt to integrate democracy and Islam.
Iraqis disagree about how much weight Shariah—or Islamic law—holds in the new Iraq. While some see Islam as merely one source of law, others—including many of the newly elected Shiites—see it as the primary source of law. If the latter view becomes dominant, Iraqi life may be better than it was under Saddam Hussein, when laws were relatively docile toward women but hundreds of thousands were killed or tortured at will, but it may be worse along predictably stringent codes seen elsewhere in the Arab world. If Shariah law becomes the dominant force in the Iraqi Parliament, oppression against women will probably be woven into the law.
Yanar Mohammad says she already feels the winds of change. In 2003, she founded the Organization for Women's Freedom (OWF) in Iraq with two other women, and since then has received a death threat for her work. "In Baghdad, there are Islamic mobs on trucks and dressed like the street police in the Islamic Republic of Iran with black and green flags on their trucks," Mrs. Mohammad said: "If a woman is driving, they assault her. If she is not wearing a veil, they tell her this is the last day she can not wear one."
The right to choose attire isn't the only freedom Iraqi women could lose. Interpretations of Islamic law vary, but issues at stake include divorce, child custody, and the basic equality of women. According to Mrs. Mohammad, polygamy—or forced prostitution by her definition—will not just be allowed but encouraged if Shariah underpins the constitution. Shariah-inspired statutes typically allow men up to four wives, and Shia Islamic law also permits temporary marriages, the practice of marrying for a short period of time while away from family.
Mrs. Mohammad predicted to WORLD that divorce will be acceptable for men but close to impossible for women: "If a man says three times 'you are divorced,' he is divorced. If a woman wants a divorce, she has to prove why she deserves a divorce." Mrs. Mohammad also contends that equality will be offered within the Shariah context of one man being equal to four women. Shariah law contends that the testimony of a man is far more reliable than that of a woman, and some use this decree for honor killings, the practice of murdering a female family member for chastity violations, including rape. Fearing that these acts could become more common, the OWF has created two women's shelters in Iraq for women who fear honor killing.
At the same time almost one-third of the 275 members of the new Parliament are female, a ratio demanded by groups like OWF and endorsed by U.S. diplomats. Many of these women are fighting for equality, but a few, unexpectedly, are speaking out in favor of Islamic law and working to enact Shariah legislation.
Jenan al-Ubaedey, one such woman, told The Times of London, "Look, I didn't make the law, God did, so it can't be changed. This is the way things are." Even when it comes to violence, she sides with Islamic law: "If you say to a man, you cannot use force against a woman, you are asking the impossible. So we say a husband can beat his wife, but he cannot leave a mark. If he does that, he will be punished." (Sura 4:34 in the Quran instructs Muslim men dealing with unruly wives to "admonish them, separate them in beds, and beat them.")
The issue of women's rights in Iraq points to the larger dilemma for Western diplomats as they promote democracy in the Middle East: Will democratic freedoms, such as open elections and the popular drafting of constitutions, produce leaders and legislation that will hinder democratic progress in the region? Kajal Aziz of the OWF says Islam and democracy take "two different directions," and that "if you look closely in [the Quran], you don't find anything good or talk about women's rights."
Here's where religious differences become key in politics: Christians understand that sin comes from within and no legislation can cure it, but Muslims believe all people are born without sin and that if government creates a pure society, then citizens will not face dangerous obstacles to salvation. Islamic law, derived from the Quran as well as the life and sayings of Muhammad, plays an important role in Muslims' quest for salvation by legislating a correct way to live, one they believe will eventually lead to paradise and the triumph of Islam.
Women are commonly the focal point in Muslim attempts at correct living. How they dress, where they go, and whom they talk to has been the topic of endless debate and restrictive laws. Saudi Arabia is perhaps most notorious for its efforts to control the lives of its women who, among other restraints, are not permitted to drive or expose any skin.
Mrs. Mohammad says attempts to draft an Iraqi constitution based upon Islamic law have produced a document with numerous black and gray areas that marginalize women as well as other groups, like Christians. Giant political groups funded by the Islamic Republic of Iran and other groups in Saudi Arabia issue regular threats against her and other activists. "For them to see a woman who is demanding full equality is an embarrassment and a risk," said Mrs. Mohammad. She fears that the final constitution draft will treat women as "semi-human," and pleads: "What kind of democracy is that? No democracy should allow that. We deserve a better constitution."
WORLD: Shariah may still seem like something far away from North American readers of WORLD. In what ways is it already hitting close to home?
MARSHALL: It motivates al-Qaeda as well as Zarqawi and his allies in Iraq. Countries that implement extreme Shariah will almost certainly become our enemies. It is also being imposed by vigilantes in the West against Muslims and others: Note the fatwa against Salman Rushdie, and the murder of movie producer Van Gogh last year in the Netherlands. There will be increasing pressure, as in Canada, to implement it in the United States. Here it is vital to ensure that Islam is not given any legal privileges not given to other religions.
It is vital that Islam itself not be given any privileges in the US. IMHO Islam is a more dangerous threat to civilization than communism ever was. It should not be be treated as a religion, it should be treated as a subversive political organization and should not be covered by the 1st Amendment freedom of religion clause. Islam isn't a religion as the authors of the Constitution understood religion, it's a dangerous death cult that intends to murder anyone who doesn't comply with it's savage 7th century "laws".
Just watch, it won't be long before the demands for an Islamic family court based on Sharia law become a reality in Michigan.
There are 13 million Muslims in the USA now, 31,000 mosks. A large percentage of them live in the Michigan area, and in places like Dearborne you already have the call to prayer blaring.
Of course our government is not going to do either of those things, and there WILL be another, and probably much worse, muslim terror attack on US soil. Maybe, just maybe, when a couple of million Americans disappear in a mushroom cloud over a US city the people will wake up and demand that the government use some common sense for once about the deadly danger of Islam. We spent trillions of dollars to defend against communism, but we allow a far more dangerous beast to live right here among us and don't even allow LE to use profiling as a tool for protecting us. I have to wonder, are there any sane people left in the US government?
Ontario now has sharia law family courts. Even though the muslim women in Ontario pleaded with the ultra leftists not to put it in.
If we compromise on women's rights in Iraq, I will turn against the whole war. Its that simple to me. If we are going in to set an example for the region then obviously women need to have rights. And not this sharia 7th century crap.
And when women get rights in these mudslime nations, and can vote, they will help take down Islam.
"If we don't stop ALL muslim immigration and deport ALL muslims who are not yet citizens we're just asking for another 9/11 or worse, much worse in fact."
You are 100% correct. We will not be able to ensure our lives and liberty until this is done.
100% agree, we need to stop additional muslim immigration, and tell the people here who aren't citizens that are muslim to get lost.
And I am a big time supporter of immigration, Hindhus fit in great from what I've seen. Same with Vietnamese, Chinese, and Korean Americans. Which those alone are a lot of the world's population!
Muslims that come here and stay practicing muslims, don't want to become Americans. And they dont' believe in liberty. They want to take over America for their cult of the dead.
When that happens, how long can it be before they demand the same kind of Sharia law courts in that state as they now have in Canada?
Only if we dramatically remove any need for oil from Islamic countries.
And that's no doubt one big reason why the Wahhabists are so afraid of western influences in strict Islamic nations such as Saudi Arabia. If their women ever get the vote along with a taste of western style freedom for themselves and their daughters it will be very hard to put them back under the thumbs of their oppressors again.
If I was a woman in a culture where I could be legally stoned to death just on an accusation of sexual impropriety without even a trial, I would find some way to get out of that culture ASAP. Muslim women can't even be safe from the barbaric Islamic culture here in the US. I remember when my son lived in St. Louis a young muslim woman there was murdered by her own father because she "shamed" the family by becoming involved in some kind of activity which is forbidden for women by Islam. What kind of "religion" tells a father to murder his daughter? It's not what our founding fathers would have called a religion, and certainly not what they had in mind when they wrote the 1st Amendment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.