Posted on 08/16/2005 9:44:09 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite
The Daily Standard has just published my latest column, which reveals to those who missed my earlier post on the arrests of two Iraqi spies in Heidelberg during February 2001. The discovery of these agents, especially given the time frame, should set off warning bells about potentially devastating connections to the 9/11 plot:
In the years following the 9/11 attacks, there has been much argument about the nature of Saddam Hussein's connections to terror. How could the U.S. government and the 9/11 Commission fail to consider this, given the other activity occurring in Germany during this period:
* Mohammed Atta and Ramzi Binalshibh meet in Berlin in January 2001 for a progress meeting, around the same time German counterintelligence claimed that they picked up the Iraqi trail.
* Ziad Jarrah, another of the crucial al Qaeda pilots, transits between Beirut and Florida through Germany twice during the 2000-2001 holiday season, flying back to the United States at the end of February.
* Marwan al-Shehhi disappears in Casablanca, then constructs a cover story about living in Hamburg.
In fact, the Commission report notes that three of the four al Qaeda team leaders (excepting Hani Hanjour, who had at that time just begun his pilot training) interrupted their planning to take foreign trips (page 244). Why would these men interrupt their preparations in this manner? Traveling in and out of the United States presented a risk--a manageable risk, as events proved--but having three of the four team leaders outside of their established cells at the same time looks unnecessarily foolhardy from al Qaeda's point of view. It also appears to be the only time after their first entry into the United States that this travel occurred. All three had some German connection to their trips. In fact, Jarrah left Germany the same week that the Germans captured the Iraqi agents.
The 9/11 Commission never mentions these arrests, nor the discovery of an Iraqi espionage operation involving several German cities during the same weeks that most of the 9/11 plotters traveled into or through Germany. In fact, no one has followed up on the arrests at all.
For a commission that chided two administrations about failing to connect dots, the Omission Commission appears to have left more than a few dots off the map. We need to find out whether the CIA and/or the FBI knew about this, as reported by al-Watan al-Arabi later in March, whether they gave that information to the Commission -- and if they did, why they never mention it once in their report. At best, it leaves the final report with yet another crippling gap in its credibility. At worst, it looks like someone has something to hide.
Yea, sort of, BUT, any UN agreement is illegal. It violates the constitution. THAT, my friend, is why "we the people" bear arms. That's why we must hold those we elect to their oath of office.
The debt is not the problem it actually helps keep the government from getting larger than it already is. It's also an insurance policy for other countries to want to see the US stay solvent.
I love it. The 9/11 Ommission.
bookmark
The gamble is that we won't...and there are an awful lot of people here in the U.S. that want us to fail.
Here's what the 9/11 Commission has to say about Clinton in 1996 and his concern about bin Laden:
President Clinton issued a classified directive in June 1995, Presidential Decision Directive 39, which said that the United States should “deter, defeat and respond vigorously to all terrorist attacks on our territory and against our citizens.”The directive called terrorism both a matter of national security and a crime, and it assigned responsibilities to various agencies.Alarmed by the incident in Tokyo, President Clinton made it the very highest priority for his own staff and for all agencies to prepare to detect and respond to terrorism that involved chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons.
During 1995 and 1996, President Clinton devoted considerable time to seeking cooperation from other nations in denying sanctuary to terrorists. He proposed significantly larger budgets for the FBI, with much of the increase designated for counterterrorism. For the CIA, he essentially stopped cutting allocations and supported requests for supplemental funds for counterterrorism. When announcing his new national security team after being reelected in 1996, President Clinton mentioned terrorism first in a list of several challenges facing the country.
For a commission that chided two administrations about failing to connect dots, the Omission Commission appears to have left more than a few dots off the map. We need to find out whether the CIA and/or the FBI knew about this, as reported by al-Watan al-Arabi later in March, whether they gave that information to the Commission -- and if they did, why they never mention it once in their report. At best, it leaves the final report with yet another crippling gap in its credibility. At worst, it looks like someone has something to hide.
Thanks for posting this. Yet another problem for the 9/11 Commission.
Isn't a German cell also suppose to be involved in the OK bombing?
FYI
Here's a heads up.
9/11 Commission, aka, The Insult After Injury Commission.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18219-2005Mar8.html
Dietrich Snell, 9-11 Commission staffer, testified on behalf of the Commission in the trial of Atta's roommate in Germany. His testimony helped the defense according to this article.
According to Jayna Davis, it was probably an Iraqi Al Qaeda cell with direct ties to Saddam Hussein's regime and intelligence service.
The German link you are referring to may be the German, Andreas Strassmeir, who may have been an German intelligence agent (perhaps ex-Stasi and a double agent), who was helping train the white supremacist gang to which McVeigh was likely aligned.
The ones behind the entire OK City operation were the Iraqis, quite likely in league with Al Qaeda who were using white supremacists McVeigh and Nichols as foot soldiers.
Read all about it in The Third Terrorist
What clinton did to appease the masses while erecting a gorelick "WALL" ?
Kean was a willing participant, but I wonder how Lehmann feels now.
Used, abused, exploited.
And the Jersey Girls, what do they have to say now.
They were useful pawns in keeping the attention away from the TRUTH.
Maybe the Bush administration could have found this out sooner if they didn't have to replace all the computers in the White House after the red diaper brigade trashed the place.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.