Posted on 08/16/2005 8:29:36 PM PDT by Homer1
Edited on 08/16/2005 8:47:35 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
WASHINGTON, Aug. 16 - State Department analysts warned the Clinton administration in July 1996 that Osama bin Laden's move to Afghanistan would give him an even more dangerous haven as he sought to expand radical Islam "well beyond the Middle East," but the government chose not to deter the move, newly declassified documents show.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
1st of many bumps...take THAT Clinton!
The New York Times said this?
I thought he was going to "take Bin Laden out"?
logon info from NYT:
user: rorahpg
p/w: 191919
Yes, but doing anything about it would have made Bubba less electable, in his mind.
Clinton aides admit little done to foil terrorism
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1464078/posts?page=6
CNN: White House April 2000 Terrorism report DOES NOT EVEN MENTION Al Quaeda.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1106927/posts
Negligence: Bill Clinton's Real Legacy On National Defense
http://www.freecongress.org/commentaries/2002/021205PW.asp
Clintons Loss?
How the previous administration fumbled on bin Laden.
http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory091103b.asp
What Clinton Knew And What Clinton Did
Ex-president become Second-Guesser in Chief.
http://www.nationalreview.com/lowry/lowry200310170939.asp
The Final Clinton Gift ? Give us Osama in 30 days, or.?..Dec.20, 2000 (title-mine)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/528591/posts
RUT-ROW REROY!
1996 was also the year Slick turned down bin Laden's head from Sudan.
A little closet cleaning. Get everything out by 2006, so its all old news for 2008. Crabby old elephantine republicans with their long memory, 9/11 was sooooo yesterday....God I hate the 'Rat machine, and the Hitlery express.
He had nearly FOUR YEARS. But, he did NOTHING. He didn't want to hurt anybodies feelings, and lose precious votes for his reelection!
Like, wow, bump.
More:
State Department analysts warned the Clinton administration in July 1996 that Osama bin Laden's move to Afghanistan would give him an even more dangerous haven as he sought to expand radical Islam "well beyond the Middle East," but the government chose not to deter the move, newly declassified documents show.
In what would prove a prescient warning, the State Department intelligence analysts said in a top-secret assessment on Mr. bin Laden that summer that "his prolonged stay in Afghanistan - where hundreds of 'Arab mujahedeen' receive terrorist training and key extremist leaders often congregate - could prove more dangerous to U.S. interests in the long run than his three-year liaison with Khartoum," in Sudan.
The declassified documents, obtained by the conservative legal advocacy group Judicial Watch as part of a Freedom of Information Act request and provided to The New York Times, shed light on a murky and controversial chapter in Mr. bin Laden's history: his relocation from Sudan to Afghanistan as the Clinton administration was striving to understand the threat he posed and explore ways of confronting him.
--Snip--
Critics of the Clinton administration have accused it of ignoring the threat posed by Mr. bin Laden in the mid-1990's while he was still in Sudan, and they point to claims by some Sudanese officials that they offered to turn him over to the Americans before ultimately expelling him in 1996 under international pressure. But Clinton administration diplomats have adamantly denied that they received such an offer, and the Sept. 11 commission concluded in one of its staff reports that it had "not found any reliable evidence to support the Sudanese claim."
OK .. why is the Slimes reporting this
This is ... well very out of character for them
Something's going on.
NO WAY do the scumbag Marxists at State volunteer this kind of information unless they KNOW that the information is forthcoming anyway. This is a pre-emptive strike, no doubt launched so that they have first crack at the spin.
Ouch! That's gonna leave a mark.
Sacre Bleu! Le poo is on the fan blades
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.