To: Homer1
Combine this with Able Danger, and it appears that the whole bin Laden situation is totally snowballing for Slick Willy this week.
I thought he was going to "take Bin Laden out"?
To: SunnyD1182
"take Bin Laden out"?He had nearly FOUR YEARS. But, he did NOTHING. He didn't want to hurt anybodies feelings, and lose precious votes for his reelection!
13 posted on
08/16/2005 8:35:50 PM PDT by
timestax
To: SunnyD1182
I thought he was going to "take Bin Laden out"?He meant, "take him out ... to a McDonalds."
26 posted on
08/16/2005 8:40:12 PM PDT by
airborne
To: SunnyD1182
A companion piece in the NYT, dated 8-17-05, is about
Able Danger.
36 posted on
08/16/2005 8:45:39 PM PDT by
gpapa
(Voice of reason from the left coast)
To: SunnyD1182
I thought he was going to "take Bin Laden out"?
------
He did. To dinner.
46 posted on
08/16/2005 8:51:11 PM PDT by
EagleUSA
To: SunnyD1182
But that was only if he had KNOWN about Bin Laden and we know he had blinders on which made him focus on only one thing.
To: SunnyD1182
Yea, yea, that's what he was going to do but then Monica distracted him.
Seriously, when I think of how immature Clinton is/was I'm totally shocked that he was president of the US. I mean shocked! And that anyone could even think of voting for Hillary knowing what we know, I can't even begin to describe the disgust I would feel for them.
146 posted on
08/16/2005 10:34:29 PM PDT by
tiki
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson