Revelation 4:11
See my profile for info
Posted on 08/16/2005 11:23:20 AM PDT by woodb01
The Cult of Evolution – the Opiate of the Atheists
evolution is based on superstitious religious secular fundamentalism
for the week of August 15, 2005 - NoDNC.com staff
ARTICLE LINK - | | | - DISCUSSION LINK
(New Discussion thread, membership is free but required)
Evolution’s basic premise is that all “life” on the planet miraculously “emerged” through a bunch of accidents. Current evolution teaches that “natural selection” is how we continue to “evolve.”
Unfortunately for evolutionists their recent beliefs have been challenged on interesting grounds. A new theory has come about to challenge the blind faith orthodoxy of the evolutionists, that theory is intelligent design.
Think of it like this, evolution believe that if you have a deck of 52 cards and two jokers, and then shuffle the deck thoroughly, and throw the entire deck up in the air as high as you can, that eventually all of the cards will land, in perfect order, and perfectly aligned. The probability of this even happening one time in a billion years approaches zero. Then, to believe evolutionary "theory," you have to accept on blind faith that this same miracle of perfect order from total chaos has repeated itself millions of times to account for each of the plants, animals, and life on earth. We'll leave it there for now. It gets a WHOLE LOT MORE COMPLICATED for the evolutionary cult. On the other hand, intelligent design says that after the evolutionist throws the cards up in the air and makes a mess, the intelligent designer comes along and carefully picks up each card and stacks them all up together, in sequence, and properly aligned.
Stepping back from evolution long enough to use critical thinking skills not taught much in public education these days, it becomes quickly apparent that evolution is nothing but a silly religious belief – a type of “secular fundamentalism” – demanding cult-like superstitious faith in the impossible. If I have your attention, let’s take a careful look at what evolution requires us to accept on complete blind faith:
These are just a few of the major problems for the cult of evolution. They are certainly not the least of the problems. For example, under the “accidents” of evolution, where do emotions come from? Where does instinct come from? Why do humans have the ability to reason and understand right from wrong? And the list goes on. None of these innate characteristics can be explained by evolution.
Evolution is not science, because it can not be tested, verified, and there are no “false results.” The only “false result” to evolution is Intelligent Design (ID) because the theory of ID proves that evolution is false and therefore evolution adherents attack ID proposals with zealous fundamentalism.
Has anyone ever seen how zealously these evolutionary “secular fundamentalists” irrationally attack competing theories without answering the underlying problems with their beliefs?
Evolutionists routinely dodge issues like the origins of the universe because they know that if you stop and think hard about these issues, evolution falls apart as nothing but a widely held religious belief. If you can't explain where the raw material for the inputs to the "evolutionary process" come from, then you have no process. If you can't tell me how life started, and where its components came from, what the specific components were, what specific “accident” created “life,” then you have no process, only religious belief.
When you refuse to evaluate the inputs to a process, you have an incomplete process, it is unverifiable, and therefore un-provable, un-knowable, and an un-testable theory from a scientific perspective. You MUST at that point insert your suppositions and BELIEFS (i.e. secular fundamentalist religious beliefs) into the process. This is where it is no longer science, but superstition and blind religious faith.
It is understandable evolutionists would avoid many of these difficult questions because it exposes the preposterous "blind faith" required to accept evolution.
The cult of evolution is the opiate for the atheists.
Evolution is an atheist’s way to excuse their denial and rejection of god, it is their religion. To the degree that evolutionists dodge the difficult questions, like the origins of life's raw materials, how the five senses came about (how did one-celled organisms get the "idea" that “senses” were even needed?), how or why or where emotions come from, or a whole host of other questions, proves that it is not science, but secular fundamentalism. To the extent that evolutionists challenge competing theories such as Intelligent Design rather than answering the difficult questions or admitting that their “theory” has holes, it is not a scientific theory subject to the scientific process, but a cult based on zealous secular fundamentalism.
And on one hand, evolutionists expect you to believe that through a bunch of "accidents" life happened and "evolved" and then later, just the OPPOSITE takes place in the form of "natural selection." In other words, the "accidents" of life lead to deliberate selection. Under "natural selection" the "great god of evolution" decides who is the strongest and smartest and everyone else must be subjected to the superior race. Sounds a lot like what Hitler's National SOCIALISTS believed to me.
No amount of proving atheism, er, I mean evolution wrong will ever satisfy the secular fundamentalist religious cult of evolution. Even when those who support the theory of Intelligent Design are willing to engage in a dialog on the issue, the secular fundamentalists come out of the woodwork and shriek from the high heavens about how they refuse to prove one iota of their religious philosophy, but demand that ANYTHING that dares challenge their orthodoxy must be proven beyond any doubt. This is the essence of religious zealotry and blind religious fundamentalism--, it is the opiate of the atheists...
If those who adhere to evolution are genuinely interested in science, then they must evaluate the whole process, and if the inputs to that process, or many of its components such as the senses or emotions do not support the process then they must reject that theory (evolution) as unworkable. To do anything less is no longer science. But then again, evolutionists are not really interested in science.
Call me weak minded but I just don't have the blind, zealous, fundamentalist faith to believe that nothing created everything (the "Big Bang") and that life just spontaneously erupted from rocks, water, and a few base chemicals (evolution) through a bunch of "weird science" accidents. Step back, stop and actually THINK about the leaps of un-provable, totally blind-faith that evolution requires and unless you're one of its religious zealots, you too will reach the conclusion that evolution is a FRAUD!
Evolution, the opiate for atheists and the biggest hoax and fraud ever perpetrated on the Western World in History...
Additional Resources:
DNA: The Tiny Code That's Toppling Evolution (DNA is PROVING that evolution is a hoax)
The controversy over evolution includes a growing number of scientists who challenge Darwinism. (The fraud of Darwinism...)
Einstein Versus Darwin: Intelligent Design Or Evolution? (Most LEGITIMATE Scientists do NOT agree with Evolution)
What’s the Big Secret? (Intelligent Design in Pennsylvania)
What are the Darwinists afraid of? (The fervent religious belief in evolution)
The Little Engine That Could...Undo Darwinism (Evolution may be proven false very soon)
And your point is?
Revelation 4:11
See my profile for info
Any reliance on probabilities to dispute evolution is deeply flawed. We know of one planet/moon in the universe with life on it. We don’t (yet?) know of any others, but we do know of other planets in the universe, and not just in our solar system. But we haven’t even closely examined the nearest one with any atmosphere to speak of. So how can anyone come up with any real idea of the probability of life happening?
That's an explanation I hadn't thought of.
Something strange there, anyway.
I'm off to work. Developing today, among other things, a popular presentation on the evolution of autumn leaf coloration and fall.
I figure they'd say, "looks like we were right about that evolution thing".
Let me attempt to intrigue you by this very child-ish thought: Can you fathom the limit of the universe? I mean, can you think of how the end of the universe will look like? Will it be a wall? If then, shouldn't something lie beyond it, be it even more wall? Isn't the very idea of an infinite universe unimanginable by the human mind? I mean, how do you have a volume without a limit? How does t universe stretch forever? What lies at the end of forever? Perhaps more 'forever'?
In other words, I don't know, and no one can really satisfy this question of yours. So to prevent himself from going crazy, man planted the idea of religion.
I'll judge people on this forum by what they write. Please supply this "boasting" post you mention.
Lets make sure what you say isnt a biased opinion.
Most of us know about Narby's loss of faith. He cant go a day without mentioning it.
There is only one excuse for entering the gates of Heavan...blaming your loss of faith on others isnt one of them.
if scientists created life through their controlled and contrived means, it would only serve to PROVE intelligent design.
In other words, intelligent design is unfalsifiable, and thus isn't science. QED
I don't know the exact probability of whether I may grow wings tomorrow either, but I don't think it takes a rocket scientist to know it is not likely to happen, just as it is not likely for matter to just evolve into a person.
Again, what is your suggestion for a better means of gaining knowledge of the world?
Even the scientific method assumes that any answer or theory may be overturned by later findings, etc.
Yes, one of the positive features of the scientific method is that science it is capable of self-correction.
Speculations and guesses alright, but well-thought out, and mathematically arrived conclusions, the best answers we'll have until futher analyses are made. At one time, nuclear energy was a speculation. "Jewish" science the Nazis called it.
its difficult to talk while gnashing your teeth...some should practice
Intelligent Design is the only scientific theory that makes sense.
ID isn't a scientific theory.
If you disagree, please offer some testable hypotheses made by ID.
You and MississippiMan seem to be working off the same script. Mind telling us where you're cribbing this stuff?
The theory of evolution doesn’t remotely suggest that you’d grow wings tomorrow. Life's been around along time you know. Lots can happen in a few billion years.
That is just another way of saying science does not know the answer yet. It is still just a best guess based on imperfect information.
Yes, but consistently and actively revised information at that. The best answers we can ever have, until futher, ongoing improvement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.