[fortheDeclaration]

The problem is, although there are many possible explanations for where babies come from, only one of those theories is currently well supported by the evidence.

I love it when evolutionists always appeal to a scientific fact that is demonstrable, but state that no such demands be made for evolution itself.

And so it is with the origin of species - the theory of evolution is not merely one of many possible explanations, it is currently the best explanation, the one most in accord with the evidence available to us. Perhaps tomorrow the evidence will point elsewhere, but we are limited to what we have immediately available, as far as science is concerned.

No, because evolution goes against the laws of the Universe.

Biogenesis, life must come from life.

The two laws of thermodynamics, energy cannot be created.

The natural trend is to decay and disorder, not order and growth.

[Elsie]

...energy cannot be created.

Well; it CAN, but MASS is destroyed in the process.

[general_re]

I love it when evolutionists always appeal to a scientific fact that is demonstrable, but state that no such demands be made for evolution itself.

I've stated no such thing. It's probably not a good sign when your opening bid is out and out BS. Let's hope things improve from here, eh?

No, because evolution goes against the laws of the Universe.

LOL. Let's see.

Biogenesis, life must come from life.

There is no such "law" in biology, except in the fevered imaginings of creationists. Strike one.

The two laws of thermodynamics, energy cannot be created.

That's one law of thermodynamics, and it only applies to closed systems. The earth is not a closed system - perhaps you've noticed that big, hot ball of flaming gas in the sky? Strike two.

The natural trend is to decay and disorder, not order and growth.

And these are just figments of our imagination, I suppose:

I think that's a whiff. Strike three, you're out.

“Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless.” Louis Bounoure. The Advocate, 8 March 1984, p. 17.

Ahem.

Anything else?

[GregoryFul]

The natural trend is to decay and disorder, not order and growth.

The universe began as a singularity of almost infinite potential. After its big bang birth of time and space, the unfolding energy yielded many time dominant eddies of stable organized resonances on its way to doom. Quarks, atoms, molecules, electrically bound objects to gravitationally bound bodies danced in glee. Throughout its lifetime, these organized eddies will exist and even potentially reverse the course of (and maybe played a part in) its entropic destiny before its apparent ultimate collapse into the original and again potentially prolific singularity.

Neat, eh? Scientists have faith in this creation story! Me too.