Posted on 08/15/2005 12:57:02 PM PDT by doug from upland
I don't understand the connection between Able Danger's info on Atta being in US and Atta being in Czech Republic and on the Iraqi payroll.
Can someone explain this to me please.
Perfect! Thank you. :)
Hey Doug...maybe the fire under Bill is getting hotter. Look at this -
Ex-president Bill Clinton now says he would have taken out Osama bin Laden before the 9/11 attacks if only the FBI and CIA had been able to prove the al-Qaida mastermind was behind the attack on the U.S.S. Cole.
"I desperately wish that I had been president when the FBI and CIA finally confirmed, officially, that bin Laden was responsible for the attack on the U.S.S. Cole," Clinton tells New York magazine this week. "Then we could have launched an attack on Afghanistan early." (On Newsmax tonight)
Lol.
This guy ...there are just no words.
I just read the Newsmax piece--let the self-indulgent idiot keep right on talking--when the REAL facts come out all of this blather can be played back in court (don't I wish!)
And he just can't resist touting himself as tougher on terrorism than President Bush--he is not just a liar; he is a delusional liar!
Clinton=disgusting
The Able Danger group say Atta as an immediate danger and wanted the Pentagon to warn the FBI. Because of the wall created by Jamie Gorelick, Pentagon officials would not let the info be passed to the FBI; Atta was apparently in the country legally with a Visa.
One member of Able Danger claims he told the 9/11 commission staff about the info they had on Atta. It was not included in their report. One of the big questions --- did Jamie Gorelick help cover up for Clinton? Another question --- why wasn't she at the witness table answering questions instead of asking them?
Thanks for the ping!
Exactly right, Doug.
It seems to me that not enough is being said about how this devolved into (the real purpose of this Commission?) a Clinton cover-up.
BTTT BTTT BTTT BTTT BTTT BTTT BTTT BTTT BTTT....thanks Doug!
Thank you.
I understand that Able Danger warned of Atta and the "Brooklyn Cell" prior to 9/11, and that the not legally required "wall" was used as a reason to block needed intel from being given to the FBI.
What I did not understand was this issue of the Atta timeline and how Able Danger's intel challenges it. And did any of AD's intel purport that Atta was in Czech and not in US when his cell phone was used?
Or is the issue more general in AD just calling into question the entire Atta timeline?
Those on the left want to dismiss Atta's visit with Iraqi intelligence in Prague. That alone justifies the attack on Hussein.
While I do fear the Clintons' getting away once again, I do believe their luck has to run out sometime.
Sending you a link to something I think would get pulled if posted in a thread. It says it all, though.
'Night. :)
the crintons are the julius and ethyl rosenberg of our time X 1,000,000!!!!
Great article; many thanks for posting it!
bttt
bttt
The truth is out there. Thanks for posting it.
bttt
Holy Cow!
bttt
thanks DFU , bookmk ping for a.m. cofffeee
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.