Thank you.
I understand that Able Danger warned of Atta and the "Brooklyn Cell" prior to 9/11, and that the not legally required "wall" was used as a reason to block needed intel from being given to the FBI.
What I did not understand was this issue of the Atta timeline and how Able Danger's intel challenges it. And did any of AD's intel purport that Atta was in Czech and not in US when his cell phone was used?
Or is the issue more general in AD just calling into question the entire Atta timeline?
Those on the left want to dismiss Atta's visit with Iraqi intelligence in Prague. That alone justifies the attack on Hussein.