Actually this is not at all a possibility I "refuse to consider." I just don't think it rises to the level of science, just like creationism and evolutionism. You dig?
You've also avoided the point I made of your faith in a 6000 year old earth, and the vast regions of science you've therefore thrown out.
Well, it's not like evolutionism has ever forthrightly acknowledged its axioms, either. Be that as it may, I will address our point forthrighty.
Just because I declare myself to be a "young earth creationist" does not mean I subscribe to the idea of a 6,000 year old earth. I do NOT subscribe to a 4.5 billion year old earth and I do NOT have to discard respectable scientific practices to do so. Neither do I feel inclined to believe in a 4.5 billion year old earth just because a gaggle of folks who rely upon their own reason and senses as the ultimate source of truth say so.
I hope you are not under the illusion that what we are discussing here is science, but the opposite is apparent.
Well fester, since you've decided that you are the final arbiter of what is, and what is not science, then it's obvious that you can believe any silly thing you wish, and still claim the mantle of "science".
Have fun in your own little fantasy world fester.