[narby]

I hope you are not under the illusion that what we are discussing here is science, but the opposite is apparent.

Well fester, since you've decided that you are the final arbiter of what is, and what is not science, then it's obvious that you can believe any silly thing you wish, and still claim the mantle of "science".

Have fun in your own little fantasy world fester.

[Fester Chugabrew]

Well fester, since you've decided that you are the final arbiter of what is, and what is not science . . .

At least you know where I stand. But my stance obviously does not make me the "final arbiter" for anyone else. Where do you stand? Do you consider reasonable conjecture over unrecorded (i.e. written down in human language), unobserved history to be science? If so, please explain how creationism is to be disqualified as "science?"

Thanks.