BUMP!!!
Good for Weldon....keep the focus on the Commission and its apparent cover-up.
I can see Tom Kean, Lee Hamilton and Jamie Gorelick with the monkey hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil smiles on their faces. Absolutely disgusting.
Build their gallows high
No way, this has to ba a joke. A republican congress critter with a set of balls?
Push for a special prosecutor, Congressman.
Looks like we need a 9-11 Commission Commission.
1) I want to know why Gorelick, the woman responsible for The Wall, was put in charge of looking at all the information coming in to the 9/11 Commission and deciding what got disseminated to the full Commission.
It doesn't make sense that the Commission investigating intelligence failures would put the woman in charge of making sure that intelligence people couldn't talk to each other in charge of disseminating information.
2) I want to know why the Commission has changed their stories 4 times.
3) There is an article on FR now that Commission members say the Able Danger operative who briefed them didn't have back-up. The article states the Able Danger operative briefed the Commission one time.
Weldon clearly says they were briefed 3 times.
4) Did it occur to the Commission to wonder why, within hours of the 9/11 attacks, we were able to so easily identify the 19 hijackers and that Atta was the ringleader?
We now know it's probably because of Able Danger.
5) Since Able Danger culled its information using open sources, surely that same information was available to the 9/11 Commission.
Did they only investigate information that was brought to them (and they didn't even do that appropriately we now understand) or did they do any investigation on their own?
If they did do investigating on their own, why didn't they find out what Able Danger found out using open sources?
6) Why did the Commission in charge of investigating intelligence failures itself have an intelligence failure in terms of not sharing ALL information that was brought to them?
A start in the right direction but not enough. Someone is guilty of dereliction of duty. Someone is guilty of compromising our nation's security.The wall of immunity for these individuals must be torn down and they should be prosecuted. Nothing short of prison time will do.
If the feds can put Martha Stewart behind bars for making questionable profits in a business transaction then surely prison is justified for those causing 3000+ deaths through intent or gross negligence!!!
Enough of blanket immunity and coverages for the ruling class. Time to kick some political a**, on all levels.
Wouldn't you???
How 'The Wall' worked so well to keep terrorism alive.
Kean has already issued a statement that the Able Danger information was not considered historically significant by the 911 commission.
The task assigned to ABLE DANGER was to identify and target Al-Qaeda on a global basis and, through the use of cutting edge technology (data-mining, massive parallel processing, neural networking and human factors analysis) and enhanced visualization and display tools, present options for leaders (national command authority) to manipulate, degrade or destroy the global Al-Qaeda infrastructure.
Government technology run by the left is worthless and did nothing to stop the twin towers from being destroyed.
BTTT
Able Danger is just the tip of the iceberg. If you knew all the stuff the partisan staffers whitewashed from the report, you would explode.
I thought the RATs were sure that Bush had prior knowledge about the 9-11 attack.
Turns out that certain RATs knew; they just didn't share with the incoming administration.
Must keep this front and center!
Fox News just did a short story on this, but it was as complete as this posting.
This could get knock the libs and the MSM off of the Judge Roberts attack and put them on defense through the '06 elections with impacts on the '08 elections.
Our new mascot should be a "Dog with a sock".