Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jimbo123
The 9/11 commission yesterday defended its decision to ignore a Navy officer's report that military spies targeted lead hijacker Mohamed Atta more than a year before the attacks — and claimed the Navy man wasn't "sufficiently credible."

A Navy officer is not "sufficiently credible," yet Jaime Gorelick and her Wall between Law Enforcement and Intelligence is?? Can you spell "Cover Your A$$"??

3 posted on 08/13/2005 4:41:49 AM PDT by JRios1968 (If you can't laugh at yourself, someone else will do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JRios1968

Are they claiming the Navy officer was lying? What on earth motive would he have to make up such a story and tell it to the Commission? I heard a soundbite where the Commission is supposedly claiming that because the officer did not or could not provide proper documentation of what he told them, that they decided to discount what he said.

HUH?????????


8 posted on 08/13/2005 4:46:03 AM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: JRios1968

"A Navy officer is not "sufficiently credible," yet Jaime Gorelick and her Wall between Law Enforcement and Intelligence is??"

Gorelick's credibility would be subject to question because she has an interest in the outcome of the proceedings.


87 posted on 08/13/2005 8:21:18 AM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson