To: JRios1968
Are they claiming the Navy officer was lying? What on earth motive would he have to make up such a story and tell it to the Commission? I heard a soundbite where the Commission is supposedly claiming that because the officer did not or could not provide proper documentation of what he told them, that they decided to discount what he said.
HUH?????????
To: txrangerette
Not credible = not matching with the commissions preconcieved notions or CYA story.
21 posted on
08/13/2005 5:00:53 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Bork should have had Kennedy's USSC seat and Kelo v. New London would have gone the other way.)
To: txrangerette
I heard a soundbite where the Commission is supposedly claiming that because the officer did not or could not provide proper documentation of what he told them, that they decided to discount what he said.
Sounds to me like the perfect way to treat a Liberal's statements.
89 posted on
08/13/2005 8:25:27 AM PDT by
JRios1968
(If you can't laugh at yourself, someone else will do it for you.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson