Seems like the NYT has been seeking out commanding officers of the Special Operations Command to comment on Able Danger. Two "former senior military officers" did under condition of anonymity.
"did not turn out to be historically significant,".....
Certainly not to the Clinton legacy.... Of course they are criminally significant...but that is not within the scope of our investigation now is it.
May these people Burn in hell!
yea exactly, "former senior military officers" give me a freaking break. These are guys playing cya right now and the old grey lady is happy to help. God I hope old Kurt got the strait on the flop on this one. I want to see the 911 commission go down hard.
There will be plenty of these stories on the inner pages of the MSM newspapers today. Saturday is "bury the story" day.
A current career military officer isnt going to comment on a Top Secret program....no matter what the NYT wants.
Here comes the former "paper of record", spinning for their party again. (yawn)
And in other news, the sun will rise in the east.
In the environment that prevailed after Gorelicks Wall Building?
The first to give up, surprise, will be Washington, D.C. Republicans. IMO. I could be wrong. They may not even bother to start.
Whatever became of the Cox Report? Delays, delays, Clinton White House censorship, delays, delays, conflicting lies and half-truths leaked to the MSM employees, delays, delays, and finally released on a Friday afternoon and promptly forgotten.
It would thus seem important to investigate the conditions (read: Clinton Administration) that led to that environment. Why didn't the 911 commission do that, I wonder?
No mention of 9-11 staffer Alvin Felzenberg changing his story this week.
No mention of the 9-11 Commission staffers scurrying to the National Archives this week, to "check their notes", and how those archives notes are what Hamilton and Keane base their joint statement on.
And no sarcastic giggles about those National Archives compromised, sanitized, Bergerized notes.
Rep. Curt Weldon said today on Fox News that there are 15 unexamined boxes of documents(!), and now 11 witnesses(!!), (NOT just 1), who are willing to testify under oath.
He also is calling for 9/11 Staffers to be questioned under oath re: their evident negligence, &/or close-mindedness, &/or cover-up behavior, and/or stonewalling.
"MoveOn" has an intelligence unit?