Posted on 08/11/2005 1:13:23 PM PDT by TheMole
We didn't make the top ten, that's a shock"
I know, what more do we have to do, Mcdermott, the Lenin statue. Ron Simms. I woulda thought we'd be in the top 5
actually I would have thought that Amarillo was more consevative than Lubbock.
Lubbock is a great place to live. It ain't purty but for some reason people just love the Hub City.
"That's Luckenbach. Lubbock is Buddy Holly and natalie maines" & Mac Davis.
I've spent about 1/3rd of my adult life in Asia. Go to Tokyo, Singapore or Osaka and the central cities are some of the nicest places there-- Ginza in Tokyo, Orchard Road in Singapore and Umeda in Osaka are all prime examples of attractive city centers.
Compare it with the central cities in America. Here in Pittsburgh, you have an attractive downtown skyline, but places you don't even want to park just a few steps away. Ditto for LA-- Little Tokyo downtown is nice, but a block away there is rubble-strewn vacant lots, druggies and winos living out of shoppoing carts. Ditto for almost any American city and for every one run by Liberals.
Why can Asia do it but America can't? You need look no further than who is running the cities. Tokyo's mayor for instance, is probably more conservative than Japan as a whole-- with congestion far more than anything in the United States. I used to walk home from the railroad station in Japan through acres of high rise housing projects. The loudest noise you could hear was some kid practicing the piano 3 or 4 floors up. According to the Jesse Jackson theory of urban crowding and poor housing, these places should've been havens of crime and dispair. Yet, most of the residents went to work, minded their business and pushed their kids to study and do well in school.
In other words, conservative values make a city (or suburb or village or rural area) livable; liberal values turn it into a hell-hole.
Hialeah is the fourth most conservative city? I guess the Cubans are still the largest voting block down there (despite the recent influx of Central Americans).
Evolution doesn't stop just because all the liberals have reached the top of the pay scale in their union contracts and want to remain at the top for all eternity. They got their 20 minutes and now it's time to step aside and let the others have their turn.
There's no way the Helen Thomas or Jimmy Carter look will be making a comeback.
I think you are right. If you follow the link to the full list, Amarillo is not even on it. It goes all the way down to Detroit, from most conservative to most liberal. I guess Lubbock is representative of the panhandle area. I will take it at number 2.
Just having McDermott should have been good enough. Those other cities must really be hopeless.
Midland (city's) population was a tad short of 95,000, according to the 2000 census. So it wasn't big enough to be included.
The thought just hit me that the "panhandle" of every state which has one is very conservative.
Pffttt... We got 7 cities on that list and we have BOXER.
ping
I think it is time to move to Utah. Seattle @ 16??? Something is wrong. No voting records will show a conservative voting trend in this cess pool.
I assume Burlington Vermont is too small to make the list. I doubt any place in America can be as liberal as here.
That, or being so close to Odessa knocks us off the list.
post 153: astonishing images of a socialist wasteland.
Bump for later
Did you note the "liberal cities" are also the most "vibrant" as well? ;-)
It's because the Hub has the most beautiful women.
I think that you are on to something...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.