Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/11/2005 11:04:27 AM PDT by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Crackingham

Headline should be: "Democrat Posturing for the Pinheads Back Home"


2 posted on 08/11/2005 11:06:04 AM PDT by JeeperFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
So she is going to throw a fit until he screams UNCLE?

The woman is nuts.

3 posted on 08/11/2005 11:06:04 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Like another FReeper eloquently said, nothing gets the patriotic juices of Rats flowing like fighting for the "right" to terminate unborn children.

Damn everything else in the Constitution, just protect abortion.

4 posted on 08/11/2005 11:06:09 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

She should like him as he seems to be more in her "court"
than ours.


5 posted on 08/11/2005 11:06:19 AM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

It's a good thing there's no 'litmus test', or things could REALLY get sticky..


6 posted on 08/11/2005 11:07:31 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
She did not threaten a filibuster, however, reflecting Democrats' hesitation to embark on all-out political warfare against the nomination.

Gee Babs....walks like a filibuster....quacks like a filibuster ....its filibuster.

Bring it on Babs..

7 posted on 08/11/2005 11:07:53 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
I actually think Reid and the other RATs will reel her in on this one. Even they realize this is not the right nominee to pick an extended fight over.

Sure, they'll whine and posture, but in the end, Roberts will be confirmed by a wide margin.

8 posted on 08/11/2005 11:07:55 AM PDT by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

It is unbelievable how obnoxious and disgusting this bea*ch is.


9 posted on 08/11/2005 11:07:56 AM PDT by golfisnr1 (Democrats are like roaches, hard to get rid of.>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
"I need to know exactly where he will stand, and I need to know if he will fight to protect and defend the rights and freedoms of the American people,'' Boxer, D-Calif

Fine, Roberts should tell her what she wants to hear and then do just the opposite once he's confirmed....

10 posted on 08/11/2005 11:08:04 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

ahahahaha... don't these DemRats do this by default?


11 posted on 08/11/2005 11:08:43 AM PDT by Cinnamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Bring it on chimneysweep!
Maybe someone (if it can be done), should take a before picture... she'll be a sister with an afro after the nuke.


12 posted on 08/11/2005 11:09:29 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
slow Senate business to a crawl if he doesn't answer her questions.

IOW, she will throw a spoiled-brat hissy fit if she dosen't get her way, despite what the President and majority of Congress want.

What a pathetic excuse of a 'leader'.

15 posted on 08/11/2005 11:10:41 AM PDT by GaltMeister (“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Boxer wouldn't support Roberts if he performed an abortion live before the Judiciary Committee. Not so long as he was appointed by President Bush.


18 posted on 08/11/2005 11:11:45 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
So they *cough* Promised not to Filibuster, and instead they will shut down the WHOLE SENATE.

Attention Gang of 14:
Now do you FOOLS get it?

19 posted on 08/11/2005 11:11:53 AM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

I wonder what logic is used by Boxer and her Abortions-R-Us crowd to defend the injuries and deaths caused by RU-486? In the interest of defending the privacy and protecting the life and health of the pregnant human Bat$hit Boxer should be demanding an immediate ban. < what was I thinking? >


20 posted on 08/11/2005 11:12:39 AM PDT by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Just a few days ago, Feinstein was saying that Roberts was on her side. Boxer doesn't seem to have gotten the message.

'Course, Boxer always was a little slow.


21 posted on 08/11/2005 11:12:56 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Slow Senate business? I can't believe I actually approve of something Boxewr wants to do.


25 posted on 08/11/2005 11:15:52 AM PDT by nickcarraway (I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
This does not surprise me in the least. It's typical Bab's Boxershorts.
27 posted on 08/11/2005 11:16:23 AM PDT by tiredoflaundry (Tampa Bay, Fl. The lightning capital of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Boxer's panties in a bunch?.........


28 posted on 08/11/2005 11:17:17 AM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? GOOOOGLE your own name. Want to have fun? GOOOOGLE your neighbor's......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

31 posted on 08/11/2005 11:21:41 AM PDT by Zacs Mom (Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson