Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Highway Bill Sends Billions to Bike Trails
AP on Yahoo ^ | 8/11/05 | Emily Johns - AP

Posted on 08/11/2005 10:20:18 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

MINNEAPOLIS - When Erika Sass moved here from Washington state, she had a choice of how to get to work: hop in the car and drive 15 minutes or get on her bike and pedal an hour.

She chose the bike.

"I've never seen trails like this," Sass said of the bike paths crisscrossing the Twin Cities, one of the nation's top bicycling areas.

The transportation bill signed Wednesday by President Bush spends most of its $286.4 billion on road-building, but it also includes a chunk of change — $3 billion by one group's estimate — to expand cycling and walking trails.

The Twin Cities are getting $25 million from a pilot project designed to measure how such trails can help reduce road congestion.

"We want to figure out how to make these trails useful, not just for fitness but for actual transportation," said Lea Schuster of Transit for Livable Communities in St. Paul.

According to the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, a bicycle advocacy group, Minneapolis already has more people biking to work than any other city — 2.63 percent of commuters.

State transportation officials said the money probably would be earmarked for construction. A mile of bike path in the suburbs can cost from $100,000 to $500,000, but can grow to as much as $1 million in the city because of the high cost of land acquisition.

A mile of new freeway, by comparison, can cost anywhere from $40 million to $75 million, according to the Metropolitan Council.

Even if $25 million does buy a lot of trail, bicycle advocates themselves downplayed the likely effect on congestion.

"It's not going to fix the Twin Cities congestion problem," said David Dixen, a board member at the Parks and Trails Council of Minnesota.

According to America Bikes, a coalition of eight national bike organizations, the transportation bill includes potentially $3 billion in bike and pedestrian money, depending on how states decide to spend the money. That figure covers projects such as bicycling and walking trails, sidewalks and bike lanes on roads, said Barbara McCann, a spokeswoman for the coalition, which lobbied for biking and walking provisions in the bill.

In Columbia, Mo., which is also in the pilot program, planners envision an extensive trails network that could be key to growth.

"Twenty-five million dollars in a town the size of Columbia and at this point in our growth could be very dramatic," said Chip Cooper, chairman of The PedNet Coalition, a group of locals that promotes non-motorized transportation. "This could really put us on the map as one of America's healthiest communities."

Like Sass, the newcomer from Washington state, Jonathan Scott pedals to his job — as a patent attorney. He does it to avoid the crowded roads.

"With the millions and billions they spend on freeways," Scott said, "it's time they spend more money on trails."

___

Associated Press writers Frederic J. Frommer in Washington and Alan Scher Zagier in Columbia, Mo., contributed to this report.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; biketrails; billions; federalspending; highwaybill; sends
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: Rodney King
I never did get a dirver's liscense, and I'll ride my bike to work if I can (no good routes at this time, so it would take too long).

I did, however, get a driver's license, and used to have CDL, plus I've had a motorcycle endorsement since 1980.

41 posted on 08/11/2005 10:39:02 AM PDT by Disambiguator (Making accusations of racism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Most people in this world, when accused of being gay in a very non-serious manner, totally ignore the accusation. Thus, there is no reward to calling them gay.

Uh? Totally ignore the accusation? Here in NY I've seen brawls break out for less(scuffed sneakers, wayward glances). Attacking someone's masculinity never gets ignored.

42 posted on 08/11/2005 10:39:34 AM PDT by NYCynic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
There are, however, two groups of people who go totally insance when called gay: Mac users and bike riders. I don't know what it is about these two groups that they take the accusation so seriously.

It's the leg shaving thing. I've heard that to use OSX, you have to shave your legs. Honest.

Or, to paraphrase that famous simpson's line: "'Lester's' a chick name, right? Right!???"

43 posted on 08/11/2005 10:39:49 AM PDT by FateAmenableToChange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: hauerf
Wow! Thanks, everybody. Socialism is great when it works for me me me meeeeeee!

Sad, ain't it? (But oh so predictable).

44 posted on 08/11/2005 10:40:35 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Bluegrass Conservative
Funny, he doesn't look gay to me. :-)

1. His name is Lance.

2. He rides a bike.

3. He wears a yellow bracelet.

4. He wears spandex.

Any questions?

45 posted on 08/11/2005 10:40:37 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: NYCynic
Uh? Totally ignore the accusation? Here in NY I've seen brawls break out for less(scuffed sneakers, wayward glances). Attacking someone's masculinity never gets ignored.

Sorry, I meant on FR.

46 posted on 08/11/2005 10:41:09 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: linear
Who cares? I'm happy to have one less driver on the road. If someone wants to bike, good for them.

They may not be off the road. The city of Houston under Lee Brown just took the money and painted another line on the streets, making the existing lanes smaller. So the bike lane is on the street, next to two or three lanes that are now too small for vehicular traffic.

No bike rider in his right mind would use them, it would be suicide.

47 posted on 08/11/2005 10:41:41 AM PDT by hopespringseternal (</i>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

W has up to this point been pretty good at avoiding his father's mistakes, but he has stepped in it with this bill. How can the GOP claim to be the "party of limited government" anymore without producing chuckles?


48 posted on 08/11/2005 10:41:49 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: NYCynic
Yea that's true, but it does work both ways. Take Sunday morning biking groups in my neck of the woods for instance. They ride three abreast, not single file like they should. They blow stop signs and traffic lights so they can keep up with the pack. They never use hand signals. etc.

The idiot community is well represented among both drivers and bikers.

Yes that's true too. From what I hear Iowa City, a college town, is full of biking boneheads. It's also the liberal hot spot of Iowa. Interesting that kids that think of themselves as receiving a higher education wind up being the worst bikers and biggest liberals around. But I wax anti-college again.

49 posted on 08/11/2005 10:42:23 AM PDT by biblewonk (A house of cards built on Matt 16:18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: CDHart

That's horrible. Is there any effort being put together to try and fight this?


50 posted on 08/11/2005 10:42:59 AM PDT by NYCynic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Am typing from a computer with one of those weird split keyboards.

Those are gay, aren't they?

51 posted on 08/11/2005 10:43:21 AM PDT by newgeezer (A conservative who conserves -- a REAL capitalist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

apparently few here care about it either - as long as it funds something they want.


52 posted on 08/11/2005 10:43:36 AM PDT by flashbunny (Always remember to bring a towel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
No one can be this dumb!

But, someone can be this petty.
53 posted on 08/11/2005 10:43:43 AM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Should read "insane". Am typing from a computer with one of those weird split keyboards.

Those are *so* gay.

54 posted on 08/11/2005 10:43:56 AM PDT by gogeo (Often wrong but seldom in doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Funny, he doesn't look gay to me. :-) 1. His name is Lance. 2. He rides a bike. 3. He wears a yellow bracelet. 4. He wears spandex. Any questions?

He's bonking Sheryl Crow. Enough said.

55 posted on 08/11/2005 10:45:03 AM PDT by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: andyk

I was not even talking about his typing.


56 posted on 08/11/2005 10:46:13 AM PDT by biblewonk (A house of cards built on Matt 16:18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
W has up to this point been pretty good at avoiding his father's mistakes, but he has stepped in it with this bill. How can the GOP claim to be the "party of limited government" anymore without producing chuckles?

You must be kidding. Republicans pass and/or sign one of these pork-laden "transportation" bills every year. That "limited government" cr*p went out the window a long time ago (think Reagan administration).

57 posted on 08/11/2005 10:46:54 AM PDT by newgeezer (A conservative who conserves -- a REAL capitalist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
Those are gay, aren't they?

Yeah. It's not mine, I am at someone else's keyboard.

58 posted on 08/11/2005 10:49:13 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
You must be kidding. Republicans pass and/or sign one of these pork-laden "transportation" bills every year. That "limited government" cr*p went out the window a long time ago (think Reagan administration).

We are in total agreement here. I have given up all hope that the Republicans are capable of governing. We need split government. Either a GOP congress or a GOP president with a GOP congress that is just barely the minority.

59 posted on 08/11/2005 10:50:52 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Either a GOP congress or a GOP president with a GOP congress that is just barely the minority.

Well if it's split with Libertarians, fine. But not with the Rats.

60 posted on 08/11/2005 10:52:10 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson