Posted on 08/11/2005 10:20:18 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
MINNEAPOLIS - When Erika Sass moved here from Washington state, she had a choice of how to get to work: hop in the car and drive 15 minutes or get on her bike and pedal an hour.
She chose the bike.
"I've never seen trails like this," Sass said of the bike paths crisscrossing the Twin Cities, one of the nation's top bicycling areas.
The transportation bill signed Wednesday by President Bush spends most of its $286.4 billion on road-building, but it also includes a chunk of change — $3 billion by one group's estimate — to expand cycling and walking trails.
The Twin Cities are getting $25 million from a pilot project designed to measure how such trails can help reduce road congestion.
"We want to figure out how to make these trails useful, not just for fitness but for actual transportation," said Lea Schuster of Transit for Livable Communities in St. Paul.
According to the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, a bicycle advocacy group, Minneapolis already has more people biking to work than any other city — 2.63 percent of commuters.
State transportation officials said the money probably would be earmarked for construction. A mile of bike path in the suburbs can cost from $100,000 to $500,000, but can grow to as much as $1 million in the city because of the high cost of land acquisition.
A mile of new freeway, by comparison, can cost anywhere from $40 million to $75 million, according to the Metropolitan Council.
Even if $25 million does buy a lot of trail, bicycle advocates themselves downplayed the likely effect on congestion.
"It's not going to fix the Twin Cities congestion problem," said David Dixen, a board member at the Parks and Trails Council of Minnesota.
According to America Bikes, a coalition of eight national bike organizations, the transportation bill includes potentially $3 billion in bike and pedestrian money, depending on how states decide to spend the money. That figure covers projects such as bicycling and walking trails, sidewalks and bike lanes on roads, said Barbara McCann, a spokeswoman for the coalition, which lobbied for biking and walking provisions in the bill.
In Columbia, Mo., which is also in the pilot program, planners envision an extensive trails network that could be key to growth.
"Twenty-five million dollars in a town the size of Columbia and at this point in our growth could be very dramatic," said Chip Cooper, chairman of The PedNet Coalition, a group of locals that promotes non-motorized transportation. "This could really put us on the map as one of America's healthiest communities."
Like Sass, the newcomer from Washington state, Jonathan Scott pedals to his job — as a patent attorney. He does it to avoid the crowded roads.
"With the millions and billions they spend on freeways," Scott said, "it's time they spend more money on trails."
___
Associated Press writers Frederic J. Frommer in Washington and Alan Scher Zagier in Columbia, Mo., contributed to this report.
biker ping
The only acceptable reason for an adult to ride a bike is if the adult lives within 10 miles of his place of work and riding the bike let's him beat 45 minutes of gridlock.
Otherwise, riding your bike after you have your dirver's liscense is gay.
Since when is a "bike trail" considered a highway?
Who cares? I'm happy to have one less driver on the road. If someone wants to bike, good for them.
I think its a great idea. As long as they're throwing money around, might as well give some to bike trails. There are a lot of 'rails to trails' projects that take old train lines and convert them to bike paths.
No one can be this dumb!
Can the President and the Congress stop the hypocrisy now and quit pretending that any one of them (with a very few exceptions) cares in the least about the US Constitution and the limits it prescribes on what the federal government can do?
.....Rabid Wild Wolves back into formerly safe Bike Trails?
Not!
Dude how old are you? 12? 13? Grow up.
The spelling error is far from being the dumbest part of that post.
A mile of new freeway, by comparison, can cost anywhere from $40 million to $75 million, according to the Metropolitan Council.
Very interesting.
By the way only 175 miles to go and my Trek will have 10K miles on it.
Perhaps they could be enclosed or relocated underground so they would be useful from mid-October to mid-April.
The bicycle nazis would rather the highways be considered bike trails.
:sigh:
Too lame for words.
China to become automobile heaven.....with cheap gas?
lao-guy.....makes free.....?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.