Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York City wants trans fats off the menu
MSNBC ^ | Aug. 11, 2005 | AP

Posted on 08/11/2005 8:25:59 AM PDT by PAMadMax

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: Sam Cree
The science behind your comment may be 100% correct, but that's not the point. COMPELLING restaurants to remove it from the food they serve? Somehow, someway I smell the familiar stench of the Center for Science in the Public Interest. Now these food Nazis have the ear of the bureaucrats, and that is particularly odius.
61 posted on 08/11/2005 11:00:10 AM PDT by PAMadMax (Islam is the enemy of all mankind...AlJazeera is its PR Firm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: PAMadMax
Somehow, someway I smell the familiar stench of the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

Your sense of smell is EXCELLENT.........also the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation most likely has it's $$, oops I mean fingers in this.

62 posted on 08/11/2005 11:20:42 AM PDT by Gabz (Smoking ban supporters are in favor of the Kelo ruling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
One of my favorite restaurants years ago in California was called The Fat Cat Cafe. Wonderful food.
63 posted on 08/11/2005 11:24:32 AM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: exnavychick
The city’s request came two years after it outlawed smoking in bars, restaurants and offices, citing concerns about the ill effects of secondhand smoke

Isn't there literary term for this, foreshadowing?

64 posted on 08/11/2005 11:25:46 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PAMadMax

see 56


65 posted on 08/11/2005 11:52:14 AM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Gabz; PAMadMax

While I agree with everyone that our government has no business acting as a fat policeman, I do think that transfats are a legitimately dangerous product. Not because they are a fat, but because apparently they cause arteriosclerosis in a far more insidious way than something like lard. They are manufactured not for purposes of flavor or nutrition, but for ease of packaging. All the stuff that has them now, like say Ritz Crackers, did not have them 30 years ago. Banning transfats is not the same as banning just fat or sugar in that it's not necessarily an attempt to regulate fat intake, but an attempt to keep a needlessly dangerous artificial product that many people are unaware of out of mostly baked goods.

I can see it more along the lines of keeping a proven carcinogen out of food.


66 posted on 08/11/2005 12:30:10 PM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Madame Dufarge

LOL...I never thought of it that way, but you're exactly right, imo. :)


67 posted on 08/11/2005 1:36:54 PM PDT by exnavychick (Whom the gods would destroy they first make chads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree

"This may not be too much of a problem as transfats are used primarily in prepackaged rather than fresh baked goods."

Don't worry, this is just the foundation to monitoring the food of all restaurants. Transfats now, just fats later. Once the sheep are following along, terminology is easy to change to fit the agenda.


68 posted on 08/11/2005 1:38:09 PM PDT by CSM ( If the government has taken your money, it has fulfilled its Social Security promises. (dufekin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: exnavychick

Hey, thanks for the ping. Yep-we've predicted this in MANY threads-to no avail. And now it's here.


69 posted on 08/11/2005 3:20:36 PM PDT by The Foolkiller ( Why......That sounds.....FOOLish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

I'm sure some of the nanny state freepers will support this..




Oh, Yeah!! "It's for the public health"...


70 posted on 08/11/2005 3:22:05 PM PDT by The Foolkiller ( Why......That sounds.....FOOLish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: joebuck
I think the apprehension most have, which I share, is that "voluntary" policies like this have a way of becoming mandatory prohibitions.

Indeed. And what is not expressly forbidden is required.

71 posted on 08/11/2005 3:24:38 PM PDT by technochick99 (firearm of choice: Sig Sauer....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree

Then it should be dealt with by the FDA or USDA at the manufacturing level - not at the menu level in a piece meal way.


72 posted on 08/11/2005 3:25:38 PM PDT by Gabz (Smoking ban supporters are in favor of the Kelo ruling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: exnavychick

To an outsider like me, it seems to have gone downhill rapidly since Guliani left, and Bloomberg took over. Correct me if I'm wrong, but ol Mikey considers himself a Republican, doesn't he?

What a joke.




DEAR GOD, how I PRAY that ratba$^#d RHINO doesn't get re-elected!! But...never underestimate the power of incumbency-I sure as hell don't. Nor do I underestimate the sheer stupidity of most voters. In fairness to Guliani (I'm not one of his biggest fans either), he did say a total smoking ban anywhere was not right.


73 posted on 08/11/2005 3:26:31 PM PDT by The Foolkiller ( Why......That sounds.....FOOLish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

There's no way they could force this, not without creating a 3-ring circus in court.




Oh, really? That's what they said about kicking smokers outside, (where people can now throw garbage down on them from windows).


74 posted on 08/11/2005 3:30:34 PM PDT by The Foolkiller ( Why......That sounds.....FOOLish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: PAMadMax
Look at the majority of New Yorkers vs the majority of Detroiters.

Most New Yorkers are fit as compared to most Detroiters.

Trans fats aren't the problem, exercise is.

75 posted on 08/11/2005 3:34:30 PM PDT by mombonn (¡Viva Bush/Cheney!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree

From everything I've heard/read, the problem with trans-fats is your body doesn't quite know how to process them.


76 posted on 08/11/2005 3:35:50 PM PDT by The Foolkiller ( Why......That sounds.....FOOLish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: kaktuskid

Time to go back to lard, beef fat, and butter




As there were far less cases of cancer when erybody ate these, I'm inclined to agree with you. When I was a kid, you didn't have all these additives/preservatives/steroids/God knows what in food.


77 posted on 08/11/2005 3:38:49 PM PDT by The Foolkiller ( Why......That sounds.....FOOLish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: PAMadMax

Cool!!! Bring back butter, bacon grease, and lard!

I don't care what anyone says, you can't make really good pie crusts or biscuits without lard!

Mark


78 posted on 08/11/2005 4:15:23 PM PDT by MarkL (It was a shocking cock-up. The mice were furious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Trans-fats are nasty things, completely unnatural.

Health-wise, you're better off cooking with lard than with trans-fats. That says a lot.

I can't wait until the "food police" realize that's what people are going to start doing... They're going to have kittens! Remember their reaction to coconut oil that some movie theaters were using to make popcorn?

Mark

79 posted on 08/11/2005 4:18:14 PM PDT by MarkL (It was a shocking cock-up. The mice were furious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The Foolkiller; All

and I thought that freepers support a small limited government....


80 posted on 08/11/2005 5:59:02 PM PDT by KevinDavis (the space/future belongs to the eagles --> http://www.cafepress.com/kevinspace1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson